My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ITEM 23 ATTACHMENT 1 - CEQA Checklist
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
071624
>
ITEM 23 ATTACHMENT 1 - CEQA Checklist
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2024 12:24:59 PM
Creation date
7/8/2024 11:58:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/16/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1650
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Merritt Property Project <br />15183 Consistency Checklist Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br /> 51 <br />Summary of Housing Element Update FEIR <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR indicted that the Housing Element Update <br />would facilitate future development of sensitive receptors within the <br />identified screening distances of existing odor sources, such as the Dublin San <br />Ramon Wastewater Treatment Plant, the Pleasanton Garbage Service <br />Transfer Station, various coffee roasters, and Vulcan Materials (but not in <br />proximity to this Site 22 [Merritt]). <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR concluded compliance applicable <br />regulations in the General Plan and applicable BAAQMD rules and <br />regulations would minimize odor emissions from adversely affecting a <br />substantial number of people within the City and impacts would be less than <br />significant. <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />Project construction would generate diesel exhaust and volatile organic <br />compounds (VOCs); however, these emissions would disperse rapidly from <br />the project site and, therefore, would not create significant odors affecting a <br />substantial number of people. As such, construction odor impacts would be <br />less than significant. <br />Land uses typically associated with odors include wastewater treatment <br />facilities, waste disposal facilities, agricultural operations, or other operations <br />listed in Table 5-4, Odor Screening Distances, in Chapter 5 of BAAQMD CEQA <br />Guidelines.3 The proposed project would involve the development of <br />residences whose operations could lead to odors from associated laundry <br />cleaning, vehicle exhaust, outdoor cooking, and waste disposal. However, <br />such odors generated by project operation would be small in quantity and <br />duration and would not pose an objectionable odor impact to future and <br />existing receptors. <br />The project’s operation would also be a potential odor receptor. Using <br />Google Maps, none of the odor-generating facilities were identified within <br />the associated screening distances, as provided in BAAQMD CEQA <br />Guidelines.4 Public records retrieved from the BAAQMD show that no odor <br />complaints were received at the location of the proposed project nor from <br />any facilities within the screening distances from 2019 to 2022. Therefore, <br />there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project. <br /> <br />3 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2022. BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines. <br />4 Ibid.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.