My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ITEM 23 ATTACHMENT 1 - CEQA Checklist
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
071624
>
ITEM 23 ATTACHMENT 1 - CEQA Checklist
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2024 12:24:59 PM
Creation date
7/8/2024 11:58:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/16/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1650
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Merritt Property Project <br />Consistency Checklist 15183 Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />88 <br />the Archaeologist, but full-time archaeological monitoring is not <br />recommended at this time. <br />The proposed project would be required to follow the City’s standard <br />condition of approval that would require all construction to stop in the event <br />that human remains were uncovered during excavation. The proposed <br />project would also be required to follow procedures outlined in Section <br />7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and Public Resources Code <br />Section 5097.98 as well as General Plan Program 5.3, which requires the <br />cessation of all construction and grading activities within the vicinity of any <br />discovered prehistoric or historic artifacts, including burial sites, until any such <br />find is evaluated by a qualified professional Archaeologist and appropriate <br />mitigation is approved by the City. Environmental effects would be avoided <br />by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards. <br />Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the <br />proposed project. The proposed project would not result in a new or more <br />severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the Housing <br />Element Update FEIR. <br />d-e) Listed or Eligible Tribal Cultural Resources and Lead Agency Determined Tribal <br />Cultural Resources <br />Would the project: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a Tribal <br />Cultural Resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 <br />as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is <br />geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the <br />landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a <br />California Native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for <br />listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local <br />register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code <br />Section 5020.1(k)? <br />Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a Tribal <br />Cultural Resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 <br />as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is <br />geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the <br />landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a <br />California Native American tribe, and that is a resource <br />determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by <br />substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth <br />in subdivision © of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.