Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7 <br /> <br /> <br />the County Clerk. Raney will prepare a Notice of Intent (NOI) to Adopt a Mitigated Negative <br />Declaration and a Notice of Completion (NOC). Raney will also prepare a Notice of <br />Determination (NOD) if the project is approved, for the City to submit to the County Clerk. <br />Raney will electronically submit the NOC, IS/MND, and State Clearinghouse Summary Form <br />for Electronic Document Submittal (Summary Form F) to the State Clearinghouse. <br /> <br />Raney will complete the following deliverables: <br />• Submit one electronic version of the Screencheck Draft IS/MND to the City that <br />incorporates City comments; <br />• Revise the Screencheck Draft IS/MND to reflect City comments and prepare a Public <br />Review IS/MND; <br />• Submit one electronic version of the Public Review Draft IS/MND to the City; <br />• Prepare the NOI, NOC, and State Clearinghouse Form F; <br />• Electronically submit the NOC, IS/MND, and Summary Form F to the State <br />Clearinghouse; and <br />• Prepare the NOD, should the project be approved. <br /> <br />Task 4 Prepare Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program <br />The objective of this task is to prepare a Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program (MMRP) <br />for the City of Pleasanton, should mitigation be required for the project. Raney will incorporate <br />existing monitoring mechanisms that are in place in order to assist the City in meeting the intent <br />of CEQA. The draft MMRP will be prepared in table format to specify any mitigation measures, <br />standards of success, parties responsible for implementing and monitoring, and timing. <br /> <br />Raney will provide the following deliverables: <br />• Submit one electronic copy of the draft MMRP to the City for review; <br />• Revise draft MMRP based on City comments; and <br />• Submit one electronic copy of the final MMRP to the City. <br /> <br />Task 5 Response to Comments <br />The objective of this task is to provide a written response to any comments received during the <br />public review period of the IS/MND, if necessary. Although CEQA does not require written <br />responses to comments on an IS/MND, Raney suggests the written responses be included in the <br />staff report to ensure the decision-makers have adequate information on which to base their <br />decision on the project. For the purposes of this scope, Raney assumes that minimal comments <br />will be received on the IS/MND. <br /> <br />Raney will complete the following deliverables: <br />• Prepare written responses to comments received in coordination with the City; and <br />• Produce an errata sheet should any comments necessitate changes to the IS/MND text. <br /> <br />Task 6 Project Management and Meetings <br />The objective of this task is to ensure extensive coordination with City staff throughout the <br />processing of the environmental document. For the purposes of this scope of work, Raney has <br />assumed attendance at up to one in-person public hearing. Attendance at additional public <br />Docusign Envelope ID: 2A85D316-C052-4009-999F-38708C3D7EBCDocusign Envelope ID: 9E909BA3-E203-400F-8158-F382D9C3612B