My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
AGENDA FULL PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2024
>
10-23
>
AGENDA FULL PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2024 11:08:57 AM
Creation date
11/6/2024 10:59:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/23/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
531
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton <br />475 and 493 St. John Street Mixed-Use Project <br /> <br />48 <br />hazardous materials in large quantities (see Section 4.7, Hazards and Hazardous Materials); the <br />project would not risk substantial release of pollutants due to project inundation. Impacts would be <br />less than significant. <br />Although not discussed in the Final EIR, the project would not conflict with or obstruct <br />implementation of a groundwater management plan. The project site overlies the Livermore Valley <br />Groundwater Basin, which is managed by the Zone 7 Water Agency. As discussed above and further <br />in Section 4.14, Utilities and Service Systems, the DSP area would have adequate water supply and <br />would not result in a substantial decrease in groundwater supplies. The project has been accounted <br />for in water demand estimates for the DSP area; therefore, the proposed project would not conflict <br />with or obstruct implementation of a groundwater management plan. Impacts would be less than <br />significant. <br />Effects and Mitigation Measures <br />No new or substantially more severe significant effects would occur to hydrology, drainage, and <br />water quality compared with those identified in the Final EIR, and no new mitigation measures are <br />necessary. <br />Conclusion <br />Impacts would be less than significant, similar to the Final EIR, and no significant new or <br />substantially increased hydrology, drainage, and water quality impacts would occur compared to <br />those identified in the Final EIR. <br />5.9 Land Use, Population, and Housing <br />Impacts Identified in the Certified Final EIR <br />The Final EIR determined that the DSP would not physically divide an established community, as the <br />DSP would facilitate infill development of vacant land and redevelopment of existing properties in <br />the urbanized downtown area of Pleasanton. The goals and policies of the DSP, as well as its land <br />use plan, were drafted and designed to promote compatibility with existing land uses. The Final EIR <br />concludes that impacts to physically dividing an established community would be less than <br />significant. Additionally, the Final EIR determined that the DSP would not conflict with applicable <br />land use plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an <br />environmental effect. Impacts would be less than significant. <br />The Final EIR determined that the DSP would not directly or indirectly induce substantial population <br />growth. The Final EIR estimated that the DSP would facilitate a 29 percent increase in the DSP area’s <br />population by 2040, compared to 2018 population levels, which is equivalent to a 1.2 percent <br />annual increase in DSP area population. The Final EIR determined that this 1.2 percent annual <br />increase is consistent with population projections prepared by the Association of Bay Area <br />Governments, the California Department of Transportation, and the California Department of <br />Finance. Therefore, the DSP would not induce substantial unplanned population growth, and <br />impacts would be less than significant. <br />Because the DSP is intended to redevelop underutilized properties within the DSP area, the Final EIR <br />determined that development facilitated by the DSP would be unlikely to result in the displacement <br />of significant numbers of existing residents or housing units. The DSP does not propose to convert <br />established residential areas into non-residential land uses, and existing residential areas would
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.