Laserfiche WebLink
P21-1173, PUD-146 and Tract 8631: 475 & 493 St. John Street Planning Commission <br />28 of 32 <br />Relationship to the Arroyo <br />The DSP includes Goal LD-G.10, to “encourage future land use development that enhances <br />the Arroyo del Valle as a riparian habitat resource.” The project, as proposed, would maintain <br />an appropriate setback from the arroyo, and would be required to ensure there would be no <br />adverse impacts to the waterway or adjacent habitat. <br /> <br />Although, during the DSP update, the desire to improve public access to the arroyo was noted, <br />the applicant has indicated that attempting to do so would raise significant liability concerns <br />and would offer little public benefit given the lack of connectivity to other parts of the waterway <br />(the main trail is located on the other side of the Arroyo). Staff does not believe there would be <br />a public benefit to providing public access to the Arroyo given it cannot be connected to the <br />main trail. <br /> <br />Traffic and Circulation <br />The Downtown Specific Plan EIR analyzed traffic and circulation impacts with buildout of land <br />uses permitted under the specific plan, including an increase of approximately 370 units across <br />the entire Specific Plan area; these impacts were found to be less tha n significant from a traffic <br />impact perspective. The plan proposes to add 14 units which falls under the 370 units <br />analyzed in the Specific Plan area. The proposed project is estimated to generate 58 additional <br />trips during the weekdays, 99 additional trips on Saturday, and 25 additional trips on Sunday <br />compared to the existing uses; in this represents a relatively small increase in trips over <br />existing uses at the site, and well within the projections of the EIR, and would not substantially <br />affect the level of service (LOS) of study intersections in the DSP area. Growth associated with <br />the proposed project was captured in the DSP FEIR’s traffic and transportation analysis, and <br />the project would not result in greater impacts to LOS than those identified in the DSP FEIR. <br />The design of the new project driveway was reviewed by the City Traffic Engineer with respect <br />to safe ingress/egress from the site for residents and commercial visitors, and by the Fire <br />Marshal with respect to emergency vehicle access and determined to provide safe and <br />adequate access. <br /> <br />Furthermore, the proposed project would not modify the use of existing bicycle and pedestrian <br />facilities on St. John Street or in the DSP area. Therefore, the project would not conflict with <br />the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. <br /> <br />The City’s Traffic Engineer has reviewed the project and addendum to the DSP FEIR and <br />determined no additional traffic analysis would be required and agrees with the findings in the <br />addendum. Finally, the project has been conditioned to pay the applicable City and Tri -Valley <br />Regional traffic impact fees. <br /> <br />Parking Standards <br />Single-family homes are required to have two parking spaces per unit (PMC Section <br />18.88.030), with at least one of the spaces covered in a garage or carport. The applicant is <br />providing two covered spaces per single-family unit, including the existing Barone home, via <br />two-car garages. The driveways for Lots 1-4, and 7-14 have slope percentages of 14 percent, <br />and 15 percent for Lots 5 and 6, which is sufficient to access each lot’s respective two-car <br />garage. The City encourages, and often requires, on-site guest parking for single-family or <br />townhome projects when there isn’t on-street parking provided within the project. During the <br />Work Session, one of the residents of the townhomes on the north side of St. John Street