Laserfiche WebLink
Project Name: 475-493 St. John St. HRE Pleasanton <br /> Historic Resources Evaluation - DRAFT <br /> Project No: HP0932.2101.00 <br /> February 25, 2021 <br /> <br /> treanorhl.com 20 <br />Criterion C/3 – Architecture and Construction <br />The main building was originally constructed in the 1880s; however, it does not retain most of its original details <br />or style having been greatly altered over time. It is of common construction and materials with no notable or <br />special attributes, and the structure does not possess high artistic value. No architect, designer or builder has <br />been identified. The main building does not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type or architectural style <br />common during post-railroad residential development in Pleasanton. The utilitarian accessory structures are of <br />common construction and materials with no notable or special attributes, and they do not possess high artistic <br />value. Overall, the property does not appear eligible for listing on the NRHP or CRHR under Criterion C/3. <br /> <br />Criterion D/4 – Information Potential <br />Archival research provided no indication that the subject property has the potential to yield information <br />important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. The subject property does not <br />appear eligible for listing on the NRHP or CRHR under Criterion D/4. <br /> <br />Integrity <br />The property at 475 St. John Street retains integrity of location since it has not been moved. The property does <br />not retain its integrity of association and feeling since it has not been used as a single-family house since at least <br />the 1970s. The building has received multiple additions and alterations over time and its original form and <br />massing is no longer evident. The building does not retain its scale and does not illustrate the original late 19th <br />century vernacular architecture. The property does not retain sufficient integrity of design, materials, and <br />workmanship. Finally, the integrity of setting has been significantly compromised by the construction of the <br />adjacent hotel to the east and the residential development to the west. Overall, the property at 475 St. John <br />Street does not retain sufficient integrity to communicate its significance under Criterion A/1 for its defined <br />period of significance. <br /> <br />493 St. John Street (APN 94-114-8) <br />Criterion A/1 – Association with significant events <br />The main house at 493 St. John Street was constructed in the 1880s during the post-railroad subdivision and <br />development period in Pleasanton that took place from ca. 1869 to 1900. The area remained sparsely populated <br />in the 1850s, but the arrival of the railroad increased the population as subdivisions along the axes of Main <br />Street and the railroad formed the core of the Pleasanton town site in the 1860s. The arrival of the Central Pacific <br />Railroad sparked a commercial, agricultural, and residential boom in Pleasanton. The subject property is <br />associated with early residential development patterns in Pleasanton, specifically with the post-railroad <br />subdivision and development period as one of the earlier residences in downtown. Therefore, the property <br />appears eligible for listing on the NRHP or CRHR under Criterion A/1. The period of significance would be <br />1880s, when the main house was constructed. <br /> <br />The cottage to the north was constructed between 1929 and 1943, replacing an earlier dwelling on site. Neither <br />the cottage nor the more recent accessory structures are associated with significant events of development <br />patterns. <br /> <br />Criterion B/2 – Persons <br />No persons of known historical significance appear to have been associated with the subject property. The <br />Trimingham family lived at the 493 St. John Street property from at least 1930 to 1965. Earl Trimingham was the <br />mayor and city councilman in Pleasanton from 1937 to 1950. Even though Trimingham was active in <br />administration of Pleasanton during the early to mid-20th century, research has not revealed any information <br />about Trimingham’s contributions being historically important in the city’s development. None of the other