My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
121724
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2024 11:39:08 AM
Creation date
12/11/2024 11:13:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/17/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
893
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> 7 CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />Introduction <br />Connection fees are also commonly known as developer fees, development impact fees, capacity fees, tap fees, and <br />system development charges, among others. This report uses the term connection fees reflecting the nomenclature <br />used by the City. Connection fees are one-time capital charges assessed against new development to recover the <br />proportional share of capital facility investment previously constructed by a utility (or to be constructed) to <br />accommodate growth. Connection fees are codified in the California Government Code Sections 66000-60025. <br />Connection fees must reflect the link between the fee imposed on, and the benefit received by, a new connection to <br />the system. The fee charged may not exceed the reasonable share of costs associated with providing the service. <br /> <br />Broadly, utilities use one of three different methodologies to calculate capacity fees: Buy-In, Incremental, and <br />Hybrid. Variations of each are dictated by local community and system characteristics and policy objectives. <br />Utilities have broad latitude in the method and approach used to calculate fees, provided the fees reflect the cost <br />and do not exceed the reasonable costs for providing service to the connection. These fees are designed to be <br />proportional to the burden placed on the system by new connections. <br /> <br />Background and Legal <br />Framework <br />Background of the Study <br />The City revised its water connection fees in 1992, wastewater connection fees in 2008, and recycled water <br />connection fees in 2015. The adopted connection fees have not consistently been adjusted annually for inflation. <br />The City engaged Raftelis in 2024 to conduct a connection fee study to examine the existing approach against <br />alternatives that may better reflect current community conditions, system characteristics, and policy objectives. <br />Raftelis worked collaboratively with City staff throughout the study to calculate the proposed connection fees. <br />This report documents the findings, analyses, and proposed changes to the City’s water and wastewater connection <br />fees. The updated connection fees documented in this report are in accordance with the rules and regulations of <br />California State Government Code Section 66013. This report is the formal technical documentation supporting <br />modifications to the water and wastewater connection fees within the City’s service area, including data sources, <br />methodology, results, and comparisons. <br /> <br />Economic and Legal Framework <br />For publicly owned systems, most of the assets are typically paid for by the contributions of existing customers <br />through rates, charges, securing debt, and taxes. In service areas that incorporate new customers, the infrastructure <br />developed by previous customers is generally extended towards the service of new customers. Existing customers’ <br />investment in the existing system capacity allows newly connecting customers to take advantage of unused surplus <br />capacity. To further economic equality among new and existing customers, new connectors will typically “Buy-In” <br />to the existing and pre-funded facilities based on the existing assets, effectively putting them on par with existing <br />customers. In other words, the new users are buying into the existing system based on the replacement costs of <br />existing assets to continue providing the same service level to new customers through repairs, expansions, and <br />upgrades to the system. <br /> <br />Page 154 of 893
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.