My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
121724
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2024 11:39:08 AM
Creation date
12/11/2024 11:13:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/17/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
893
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> 11 CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />Figure 3: Formula for Hybrid Approach <br /> <br /> <br />RECOMMENDED METHODOLOGY <br />Since new capacity is currently being constructed to meet expansion needs, and the existing capacity is insufficient <br />for new development, the City selected the Incremental approach, which is forward-looking. <br /> <br /> <br />System Value and Equivalent <br />Units <br /> <br />This section details the calculation of the per-unit costs for the Incremental approach. <br />Water Connection Fee <br />SYSTEM VALUE <br />The cost basis for determining the Incremental, or expansion, system value was provided by City Staff. The $22.3 <br />million valuation includes all expansion-related capital expenses identified in the Water Distribution System <br />Capacity Master Plan dated November 2023 and adopted by the City in May 2024. These expenses are the share of <br />the City’s water capital improvement plan that are allocated to future users. The growth-related expenses identified <br />in the new water master plan are used for the water system value. <br /> <br />The 1992 water master plan had specific costs applicable to N. Pleasanton District 2B; thus, a separate connection <br />fee was calculated for those customers. A future review of the water connection fees will use a hybrid approach <br />and reevaluate the backbone water costs applicable to N. Pleasanton District 2B customers. Therefore, the City’s <br />existing water connection fees for N. Pleasanton District 2B customers should be used until this future analysis <br />using the hybrid approach has been completed. <br /> <br />EQUIVALENT UNITS <br />To determine the Incremental component, the second step is to determine the capacity that can be served by the <br />expansion improvements above. The expansion CIP projects are estimated to add approximately 6.06 million <br />gallons per day (MGD) per the East Pleasanton Specific Plan and Tri-Valley Municipal and Industrial Water <br />Demand Study. The single-family residential (SFR) equivalent capacity demand is calculated by taking the gallon <br />per day (GPD) demand for a typical single-family home and multiplying it by the SFR maximum day peaking <br />factor to obtain the GPD maximum day demand2. This value is used to divide the GPD additional capacity to <br />calculate the additional SFR equivalent units served by expansion projects. This calculation is detailed in Table 1. <br /> <br /> <br />2 SFR demand and peaking factors were identified in the Water Distribution System Capacity Master Plan, November <br />2023. <br />Page 158 of 893
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.