Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> WATER CAPACITY AND MISCELLANEOUS FEE STUDY 12 <br /> <br />Table 1: Projected Water SFR Equivalents <br />Line No. Description Derivation Values <br /> Future Water System Capacity <br />1 Future Capacity (MGD) - 6.06 <br />2 Future Capacity (GPD) Line 1 x 1,000,000 6,060,000 <br /> <br /> SFR Equivalent Capacity Demand <br />3 GPD Demand - 390 <br />4 Max Day Peaking Factor - 1.9 <br />5 GPD Max Day Demand Line 3 x Line 4 741 <br /> <br />6 SFR Equivalent Units Served Line 2 / Line 5 8,178 <br /> <br />INCREMENTAL UNIT COST <br />The Incremental unit cost for an SFR equivalent is the quotient of the Incremental system valuation divided by the <br />additional SFR equivalent units served by expansion projects. The Incremental unit cost component is $2,721.29 <br />per SFR equivalent unit. Table 2 shows the unit cost calculation. <br /> <br />Table 2: Water Incremental Unit Cost Calculation <br />Line No. Fee Calculation Derivation Values <br />1 Expansion CIP - $22,255,100 <br />2 SFR Equivalent Units Served Table 1 8,178 <br />3 SFR Equivalent Unit Fee Line 1 / Line 2 $2,721.29 <br />Wastewater Connection Fee <br />SYSTEM VALUE <br />The cost basis for determining the Incremental, or expansion, system value was provided by City Staff. The $5.0 <br />million valuation includes expansion projects related to upsizing pipes in the system, as shown in Table 3 below. <br /> <br />Table 3: Wastewater Incremental System Value <br />Line No. System Valuation Derivation Values <br />1 Project 3: Upsize Pipes downstream of Stoneridge <br />Mall - $3,000,000 <br />2 Project 4: Upsize Pipes on Kamp and Stoneridge <br />Drive - $2,019,000 <br />3 Total Expansion CIP Line 1 + Line 2 $5,019,000 <br /> <br />EQUIVALENT UNITS <br />To determine the Incremental capacity fee, the next step is to determine the demands that can be served by the <br />expansion improvements above. The SFR equivalent capacity demand for wastewater is calculated by multiplying <br />the SFR demand based on billed water consumption times a return to sewer factor to estimate the amount of water <br />usage entering the wastewater system. The return to sewer factor calculation is outlined in Table 4. The City <br />provided the estimated billed water consumption in hundred cubic feet (HCF) and the number of wastewater <br />accounts for previous financial planning work. Table S1101 (2022: ACS 1-Year Estimates) from the U.S. Census <br />Bureau is used for the average family size. The flow per day is based on California Water Code Section 10608.20 <br />(b) (2) (A). The SFR equivalent capacity demand calculation is outlined in Table 5. <br />Page 159 of 893