Laserfiche WebLink
Page 14 of 17 <br />• Project with a Building Permit application deemed substantially complete by the <br />effective date. <br /> <br />These provisions would not supersede or replace vesting conferred by provisions of State law <br />or an existing Development Agreement, would still apply any annual cost adjustments as <br />reflected in the Pleasanton Municipal Code, and would not preclude the City and a developer <br />from negotiating fees as part of a development agreement or similar mechanism. <br /> <br />Summary of Recommendations <br />For convenient reference, the various fees and the alternatives are summarized below: <br /> <br />Topic Summary of Alternatives and Staff <br />Recommendation <br />1. Sewer and Water Connection Fees, All <br />Connection Types <br />No Alternatives proposed <br />RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Sewer and <br />Water connection fees at Maximum Levels <br />2. Single Family Detached, TIF, CFF and <br />Affordable Housing Fees <br />Alternative 1: Adopt maximum fee levels <br />Alternative 2: Reduce Single Family <br />Detached Affordable Housing In-Lieu fee <br />amount to $42.10 per square foot to match <br />Townhomes <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Alternative 2 <br />3. Residential Townhomes, TIF, CFF and <br />Affordable Housing Fees <br />No Alternatives proposed <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION: Adopt CFF, TIF and <br />AH In-Lieu Fees at Maximum Levels <br />4. Residential – Multifamily Apartments <br />and Condominiums, TIF, CFF and <br />Affordable Housing Fees <br />Alternative 1:Maintain existing aggregate fee <br />level <br />• Alternative 2: Reduce aggregate fee <br />level to the average of peer <br />jurisdictions <br />o Option 2A: Focus reductions <br />on Affordable Housing In-Lieu <br />Fee, with secondary <br />recommendation for 2 year “fee <br />out” option for up to 30% of <br />inclusionary units <br /> <br />o Option 2B: Focus reductions <br />on CFF and TIF <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION:Adopt Alternative <br />Page 220 of 893