Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 of 5 <br />• May–June 2025 Budget Workshop(s): proposed biennial budget and 5-year CIP <br />• June 2025 City Council Meeting: operating and capital budget adoption <br /> <br />This approach would save City funding by not engaging a consultant but would lose the benefit <br />of engagement with the broader community who typically do not attend City Council meetings, <br />which could have equity impacts. This additional community engagement is particularly critical <br />in the current budget cycle, which is likely to include program and service cuts that could <br />impact specific interest groups or marginalized communities. This approach would also <br />eliminate the BAC, which would save staff time and associated internal costs, but would lose <br />the opportunity for BAC members to collaborate with the City Manager to offer insights and <br />recommendations on City program priorities and strategies. <br /> <br />Alternative B: Budget Advisory Committee Only <br />Another alternative is to only establish a Budget Advisory Committee, with no additional <br />community engagement. The proposed BAC will represent key community stakeholders, <br />enhancing and deepening public engagement in the budget development process. Retaining <br />the BAC will preserve some elements of increased transparency and public engagement in <br />compliance with the Brown Act beyond the traditional budget development approach outlined <br />in Alternative A. However, without the recommended additional community engagement there <br />is a risk of engaging with less diverse community members, and losing the benefit of input from <br />a broad portion of the community. <br /> <br />Alternative C: Community Engagement Only <br />Staff could eliminate the BAC and focus only on community engagement efforts. This <br />alternative would significantly reduce staff efforts to administer the BAC but would lose the <br />benefit of the insights of a community committee. To deliver the full proposed scope of a town <br />hall, two pop-ups and an online engagement tool, a consultant contract of up to $50,000 would <br />still be needed to complete the engagement work in the time remaining, although the full <br />contract authorization may not be used as additional staff time could be freed up by the <br />elimination of the BAC. The consultant contract could also be eliminated entirely, in which case <br />the scope of engagement could be reduced to a single town hall, to preserve some level of in- <br />person community engagement. This would eliminate the online budget tool and other live <br />events, such as pop-ups, which could save some consultant funds, but would minimize the <br />reach and effectiveness of the engagement. A purely staff-led option would also lose the <br />significant benefits of the consultant expertise in engagement design and data analysis. <br /> <br />EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY <br />The budget engagement plan aligns with the City's values of inclusion and sustainability by <br />actively engaging diverse community representatives in addressing fiscal challenges to ensure <br />recommendations reflect the broader community's needs. This approach is consistent with the <br />City's ONE Pleasanton Strategic Plan Goal E. Building a Community Where Everyone <br />Belongs. Additionally, the budget engagement work will support long-term financial <br />sustainability, consistent with Goal A. Funding Our Future by identifying cost-effective solutions <br />for maintaining high-quality services and infrastructure. <br /> <br />OUTREACH <br />No outreach was conducted, as this item is a routine matter of City business. <br />Page 284 of 893