My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
121724
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2024 11:39:08 AM
Creation date
12/11/2024 11:13:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/17/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
893
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 7 of 8 <br />January Project Worksheet Development (Phase 1) <br />February Prioritization Project Review (Phase 2) <br />March Staff Recommended CIP List (Phases 3 – 4) <br />April Budget Advisory Committee (or other public input, if BAC is not established) <br />May City Council review of Proposed Capital Budget & CIP (Phase 5) <br />June Adoption by City Council (Adoption - Phase 5) <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVE <br />Alternatively, the City could continue to use its prior CIP project intake and selection process <br />wherein the individual Mayor and City Council members, City commissions and committees, <br />staff, and the community populate a list of current and desired projects for the City Council’s <br />review; projects that receive a majority vote of the City Council are included in the CIP and <br />planned/programmed based on available financial and staff resources. This approach is not <br />recommended for several reasons, including investments that do not meet the City’s short- <br />term and long-term infrastructure needs, decisions that might unintentionally perpetuate <br />inequities in infrastructure or service delivery across the city, and projects that may not best <br />meet the current needs of the community. <br /> <br />EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY <br />The Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Process establishes an equitable and <br />sustainable way to prioritize capital improvement projects. Categories include focus factors <br />that align with the Climate Action Plan (CAP 2.0) goals and environmentally sustainable <br />practices will be required as part of projects to maximize project scoring capabilities. <br /> <br />OUTREACH <br />The CIPPP program was developed based on the ONE Pleasanton Strategic Plan, which <br />included an extensive outreach program along with other qualitative and quantitative <br />community input. <br /> <br />STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT <br />The CIP prioritization criteria provide essential guidelines for decision-making for capital <br />improvement projects, ensuring these projects are aligned with the broader goals of the ONE <br />Pleasanton Strategic Plan. The integration of all six prioritization criteria is driven by the <br />strategy that calls for the implementation of the city's four-year Capital Improvement Program <br />with the goal of Investing in Our Environment. This strategy serves as the core mechanism that <br />ensures capital improvement projects are not only well-planned but also address the City's <br />priorities in areas such as sustainability, infrastructure, and public facilities. <br /> <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />The implementation of this process does not have a direct fiscal impact but will provide City <br />Council direction for the development and implementation of the Capital Improvement <br />Program, which will have a long-term financial impact on the overall maintenance and <br />condition of the City’s infrastructure. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Page 306 of 893
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.