My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
121724
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2024 11:39:08 AM
Creation date
12/11/2024 11:13:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/17/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
893
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />CIPPP-01 <br />Page 1 of 16 <br />SUBJECT: CIP Process and Prioritization (CIPPP) Strategy <br />EFFECTIVE DATE:December 17, 2024 <br />Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Defined <br />The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) guides the City’s long-term, strategic decision- <br />making regarding the construction, repair, and replacement of the City’s assets, including <br />facility buildings, parks, streets, miscellaneous City facilities, stormwater, water, and sewer <br />systems. The Capital Improvement Program is essential for strategic infrastructure planning, <br />ensuring reliable asset management, financial efficiency, regulatory compliance, and risk <br />mitigation; it supports community development, aligns projects with organizational goals, <br />enhances operational efficiency, and fosters transparency with stakeholders. <br />The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is defined as the City’s financial plan for the <br />construction of the City’s capital improvements. Capital improvements are the addition of a <br />permanent structure, structural change, or the restoration of the City’s assets that will either <br />enhance the asset’s overall value, prolong its useful life, or adapt it to new uses. The City’s <br />assets span a wide variety of categories, including streets and related right-of-way features; <br />stormwater and drainage systems; water and sewer systems; public buildings such as the <br />library, parks, recreational and community centers; and public safety facilities such as police <br />and fire stations. Capital investments are necessary for the construction of all parts of the City’s <br />infrastructure. <br />The Importance of Infrastructure <br />The importance of quality infrastructure cannot be overstated. Without functioning <br />infrastructure, the City’s economic prosperity cannot be sustained. The quality of neighborhood <br />infrastructure will directly determine the livability of the City’s neighborhoods. The <br />community’s health, safety, and natural environment depend on available and quality <br />infrastructure. Decisions about capital investments affect the availability and quality of most <br />government services, as well as many private services. Infrastructure connects residents to <br />opportunities for employment, healthcare, and education via extensive transportation, power, <br />water, and telecommunication networks. Ongoing investments will enhance the quality of life <br />for every neighborhood. In addition to legal mandates, the prioritization of CIP projects should <br />also consider social, economic, and geographic factors. <br />Purpose of this Prioritization Process <br />A CIP prioritization process using a systematic approach to rank projects is intended to help <br />the City allocate resources effectively and make data-driven decisions on capital investments. <br />A CIP Process and Prioritization (CIPPP) strategy that aligns with the ONE Pleasanton <br />Strategic Plan and community input is an essential step in ensuring resources are effectively <br />allocated to the most critical projects, helping to address urgent needs, optimize funding, and <br />meet regulatory deadlines, while acknowledging local priorities. The proposed prioritization <br />evaluation is developed around six key categories, each with a weighted scoring system, to <br />assess the relative importance of various projects. The process also establishes procedures for <br />Page 308 of 893
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.