CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET

DRAFT CIPPP-01 Page 2 of 16 excluding annual core and enterprise-funded programs from prioritization and introduces a sunset clause to remove outdated or stalled projects from the CIP. Importantly, the CIP prioritization aligns with Pleasanton's broader strategic goals, particularly in sustainability and environmental impacts, ensuring necessary capital investments and supporting the City’s long- term vision for growth and improvement. The adopted CIPPP strategy and guidelines will be used to establish the City’s future Five-Year Capital Improvement Program. Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (5-Year CIP) Pleasanton adopts a Five-Year CIP that has a “call” for projects at a two-year cycle and modifies the program throughout the year through City Council actions and the Mid-Term CIP Update. With the approved CIP Prioritization strategy, the city will establish an upcoming Five-Year CIP following the process outlined in this document. Project Funding Restricted Funds: Projects within restricted funding categories will compete only with projects within the same funding category. Prioritization within these restricted funding categories will occur in accordance with this CIP prioritization process except Water and Wastewater Program. The following is a partial listing of restricted funding categories: a. State and Federal Funds b. Development Impact Fees c. Enterprise Funds (Golf, Cemetery, Wastewater, Storm and Water) d. Grants. Enterprise-funded programs with an approved Master Plan are excluded from the CIP prioritization process. The Water and Sewer CIP programs are guided by its Master Plans. These projects will not compete for other general funds. Unrestricted Funds: Projects that are not within a restricted funding category or use a combination of either restricted or non-restricted funding will compete for general fund or bond proceeds in accordance with this CIP prioritization process. Although capital needs from the restricted funds or revenue-producing departments are often separate from the General Fund, the capital investments of all City departments should be planned together to allow better coordination of capital projects in specific parts of the city over time and ensure equitable use of resources. Citywide coordination of capital project planning can increase the cost- effectiveness of the City's capital programs by allowing more efficient infrastructure investments. Asset Categories To ensure that the comparison is conducted between similar types of projects, the needs, and CIP projects will be separated into categories according to the predominant type of asset and Page 309 of 893