Laserfiche WebLink
Page 8 of 9 <br />would still be required to pay a pro-rata share of the Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fee for the <br />units not constructed on-site. The intent of this provision is to stimulate near-term multi-family <br />housing production, by providing some relief as to the typical on-site inclusionary requirement. <br />Because the multi-family in-lieu housing fee was also reduced below the maximum that could <br />be charged, overall development costs should be reduced as a result of this action. <br /> <br />Applicability of Updated Fees to Projects in Process <br />With respect to projects in process and with active applications, the draft resolution of adoption <br />of the fees incorporates a policy regarding the applicability of the new fees to such projects. <br />The City Council supported staff’s recommended policy language, as reflected in Attachment <br />1. See the November 17, 2024 Agenda Report for additional discussion of this item. As noted, <br />these provisions would not supersede or replace vesting conferred by provisions of State law <br />or an existing Development Agreement, and would still apply any annual cost adjustments as <br />reflected in the Pleasanton Municipal Code. Furthermore, they would not preclude the City and <br />a developer from negotiating fees as part of a development agreement or similar mechanism. <br /> <br />Note that the proposed fees, if adopted on December 17, would become effective 60 days <br />after adoption, on February 15, 2025. <br /> <br />Municipal Code Amendments <br />Amendments are proposed to several chapters of the PMC that relate to impact fees: <br />specifically Chapters 3.22 - Capital Facilities Fees; 3.26 - Transportation Development Fee; <br />and 14.04- Regulation of Water System and Water Service Fee. A redlined/strikeout version of <br />the proposed text amendments is included as Exhibit A to Attachment 2. In Chapters 3.22 and <br />3.26, the majority of the changes are to align and make more consistent definitions and <br />procedural requirements for calculation and application of fees between the chapters, and to <br />clarify administrative provisions around fee credits. The changes also include minor changes to <br />align with the nexus fee studies, such as referencing the refined list of land use categories, and <br />including reference to a per-square-foot basis for applying fees. <br /> <br />With respect to Chapter 14.04, minor revisions have been made to reference provisions for <br />sub-metering of attached single-family projects, to clarify that the City Engineer may authorize <br />this in situations where it is deemed appropriate to do so, and to update the definition for <br />"water system" to delete an antiquated reference. <br /> <br />CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) <br />The adoption of this Resolution is not a project within the meaning of Section 15378 of the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines because there is no potential for it to <br />result in a physical change in the environment, either directly or indirectly, in that the resolution <br />provides only for the adoption of amendments to existing fees imposed on new development. <br />Additionally, it is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) <br />because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility of a significant effect on the <br />environment and contains no provisions that will directly or indirectly result in a physical <br />change in the environment. <br /> <br />EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY <br />Adopting the updated fees helps to advance equity and sustainability goals by ensuring that <br />new development contributes to the necessary facilities and infrastructure, including upgrading <br />Page 56 of 893