Laserfiche WebLink
and both residents and City Council should approve of them. <br />6. Please fix a few minor items in Exhibit A. <br />- Task #3 adds "...team will also review adjacent agencies’ bicycle <br />and pedestrian plans..." which seems redundant to Hexagon's <br />second bullet point in Task 2. <br />- Also, please add the Alameda Countywide Bikeways Network <br />(something City staff contributed to without ever sharing to BPTC - <br />see also request #5). <br />- Task 3.2 makes reference to "task 2.2" but there is no such thing in <br />this document. Should we assume this is "task 3.1"? <br />- Task #4, (BPTC) Meetings, includes typos. "up to four (4)" should be <br />"at least four (4)" based on the rest of the paragraph. The next <br />sentence reads, "Four Three of the meetings are..." which I assume <br />should be "Three". The suggestion that holding BPTC "...concurrently <br />with the community meetings..." seems disingenuous; community <br />meetings where BPTC is present are not the same as BPTC <br />meetings. If you value the BPTC's input, there should be a review <br />meeting after the completion of each task (Task 2, Task 3.1, Task <br />3.2, Task 3.3, Task 3.4, Task 5, and at least one meeting to review <br />community outreach prior to final prioritization of projects).