Laserfiche WebLink
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL <br />2 <br />Station Livermore Pleasanton Other Total <br />1 – Nevada St. 71 1732 46 1849 <br />2- Stoneridge Mall Rd. 18 1693 402 2113 <br />3 – Santa Rita Rd. 241 2665 213 3119 <br />4 – Oak Vista Way 17 1900 120 2037 <br />5 – Machado Pl. 214 370 17 601 <br />Pleasanton Total 510 7012 721 8243 <br />Note: Pleasanton receives funding for responses to unincorporated Alameda <br />County, including Remen Tract, Castlewood, and areas around Ruby Hill. <br />Pleasanton receives funding from the Veteran’s Administration for “second-due” <br />coverage to the Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Center – Livermore (Arroyo Rd.). <br />Fire Station general locations: <br />•Fire Station 1 – headquarters near Stanley Bl. X Bernal Av. <br />•Fire Station 2 – Stoneridge Mall <br />•Fire Station 3 – Santa Rita Rd. X West Las Positas Bl. <br />•Fire Station 4 – across from the fairgrounds <br />•Fire Station 5 – outside Ruby Hill <br />5.Do we have a list of all unfunded mandates and how much that costs us per <br />year? <br />A.Staff is developing a list of unfunded mandates that includes regulations that <br />impact the City across all departments. Examples include areas such as <br />water conservation, air quality, water quality, climate, safety, etc. Staff will <br />continue to develop the list to provide it to the City Council in the coming <br />weeks. <br />Agenda Item #8: Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional <br />Services Agreement with Hexagon Transportation Consultants in the amount of <br />$244,838 to provide planning and engineering services for an update to the Pleasanton <br />Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, including a 20 percent contingency of $48,968, for <br />a total cost of up to $293,806, funded by the Alameda County Measure BB fund in the <br />Bicycle and Pedestrian-related Improvements project, CIP No. 23543 <br />Written Public Comment Submitted questions: <br />6.Why complete a full update instead of a minor update? <br />A.Staff’s review of the chapters included in the 2018 Masterplan identified <br />sections of each chapter that required updating. As staff reviewed the <br />necessary changes, the scope increased from a minor update to a larger <br />scale update. As an example, the 2018 plan did not clearly define corridors or <br />projects within the corridors and significant changes to the corridor names