My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
031825 REGULAR
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2025 2:43:59 PM
Creation date
3/18/2025 2:36:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2025
EXPIRATION DATE
3/18/2045
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL <br />4 <br />and parts are no longer available. The body of the new vehicles has changed <br />and the recommendation for the current length is longer than the current light <br />bars. Other costly equipment includes push bumper due to change in <br />mounting bracket, rear seat not compatible with new vehicles and siren <br />control center (end of life and has been used for four vehicles already) <br />existing is outdated and being replaced. <br />Agenda Item #18: Review and provide initial input on applicant-proposed East Lakes <br />Residential Development Project in East Pleasanton <br />11. Is there anything else that can be shared about airport impacts and risk? <br />A.The staff report summarizes staff’s current understanding of airport-related <br />impacts and risks. As described and depicted in the Agenda Report, the East <br />Lakes site is well outside of any of the LVK airport safety zones. The Airport <br />Protection Area was a boundary established by Livermore, and incorporated <br />into the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, intended to limit noise-sensitive <br />uses, and thereby reduce noise related complaints and conflicts that might <br />curtail airport operations. As part of the project evaluation, additional analysis <br />of airport-related noise, hazards and other issues will be required, and will <br />ultimately provide the City Council with the detailed information to properly <br />assess whether or not residential development in the APA can be supported. <br />12. Is there a map that shows the current urban growth boundary? <br />A.Please see Attachment 1, which depicts the Urban Growth Boundary and <br />City Limit Line in the vicinity of the project, as mapped in the City’s GIS <br />system. <br />13. Is there more information about the cost to build El Charro? <br />A.Staff is working with Mark Thomas Inc. to develop construction cost estimate <br />for El Charro Road. This preliminary cost estimate will help to determine the <br />necessary financing and cost sharing that will be needed. <br />The preliminary cost estimate was just received (March 17, 2025) and staff is <br />evaluating the costs provided. The initial estimate shows a total cost of $110 <br />million to construct El Charro Road from Stoneridge Drive to Stanley <br />Boulevard. <br />It should be noted that some of the $110 million will be the sole responsibility <br />of the developers (those adjacent to the new roadway are required by the <br />Pleasanton Municipal Code to improve their project frontage) and some of the <br />$110 million will be a shared cost between the developers and the City. <br />14. Did the cost benefit (EPS) analysis that was done for the East Side projects <br />include the cost of El Charro?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.