Laserfiche WebLink
November 8, 2024 <br />Page 25 <br /> <br />7357-013acp <br /> printed on recycled paper <br />California Office of Noise Control Land Use Compatibility Guidelines.125 Ms. <br />Toncheva concludes that operational noise impacts are therefore significant. The <br />DEIR’s conclusion that operational noise impacts are less than significant is <br />therefore not supported by substantial evidence. <br /> <br />Ms. Toncheva’s comments also provide substantial evidence that noise from <br />off-site elements of the Project, including the proposed sewer treatment plant <br />located in Parcel B adjacent to the Project Site will result in a significant <br />environmental impact.126 Ms. Toncheva’s comments demonstrate that the pumps <br />on top of separation tanks could allow noise to propagate deep into an adjoining <br />neighborhood, significantly disturbing noise sensitive receptors.127 Further, Ms. <br />Toncheva concludes that the nearby lake would further exacerbate operational <br />noise from the sewer treatment plant.128 Ms. Toncheva’s comments provide that the <br />lake’s “smooth water surface reflects sound, and the effect can be amplified by <br />morning and evening air inversions.”129 The Project’s sewer treatment plant results <br />in significant, unmitigated operational noise impacts to nearby sensitive receptors, <br />which must be analyzed and mitigated in a revised and recirculated EIR. <br /> <br />Further, Ms. Toncheva’s comments point to the DEIR’s failure to adequately <br />analyze the cumulative operational noise impacts associated with the Project. The <br />DEIR includes a public comment that: “The Draft EIR should analyze noise impacts <br />associated with proximity to the City of Pleasanton Operations Services Center, <br />Fire Training Facility, and Police Department practice range.”130 The DEIR fails to <br />adequately address the potentially significant cumulative operational noise impacts <br />of these projects, even though these facilities are mentioned as dominant noise <br />sources near the Project site.131 The DEIR’s failure to adequately analyze the <br />cumulative operational noise impacts of these Projects is a failure to proceed in the <br />manner required by law. <br /> <br />The DEIR fails to analyze noise impacts to the adjacent Senior East County <br />Lakes Project. Ms. Toncheva’s comments demonstrate that the DEIR’s failure to <br />include analysis of the Senior East County Lakes Project in the environmental <br />baseline for the Project results in an underestimation of the Project’s operational <br />noise impacts. <br /> <br /> <br />125 https://www.lci.ca.gov/docs/OPR_Appendix_D_final.pdf <br />126 Toncheva Comments, p. 3. <br />127 Toncheva Comments, p. 3. <br />128 Toncheva Comments, p. 3. <br />129 Toncheva Comments, p. 3. <br />130 DEIR, pg. 3.12-1. <br />131 DEIR, pg. 3.12-10.