My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
031825 REGULAR
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2025 2:43:59 PM
Creation date
3/18/2025 2:36:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2025
EXPIRATION DATE
3/18/2045
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 8, 2024 <br />Page 26 <br /> <br />7357-013acp <br /> printed on recycled paper <br />The DEIR must be revised and recirculated to include analysis of the <br />Project’s and nearby projects’ cumulative operational noise impacts before the <br />Project can proceed. <br /> <br />ii. The DEIR Underestimates Construction Noise Impacts <br /> <br />The DEIR concludes that construction noise impacts are less than significant. <br />This is not correct. Construction noise will exceed the Federal Transit <br />Administration’s 80 dBA threshold at nearby sensitive receptors.132 Ms. Toncheva <br />calculated that construction noise at nearby residences would be over 82 dBA.133 <br /> <br />The DEIR’s construction noise analysis assumes shielding from the existing <br />6-foot high sound wall located along the project’s western boundary adjoining the <br />residential land uses.134 Ms. Toncheva’s comments provide that the DEIR provides <br />no evidence in the form of measurement data, or clarification on the type of wall, to <br />support the determination that the 6-foot wall would shield the Project’s noise <br />impacts.135 The DEIR provides that “[w]hile the proposed project would raise the <br />project site by approximately 6 feet adjacent to the western boundary of the project <br />site, the proposed project would include a retaining wall and good neighbor wall to <br />minimize impacts relate to existing visual characteristics of the site.”136 The DEIR <br />does not provide any definition of a “retaining wall” or a “good neighbor wall” or <br />provide the public with any certainty that this would constitute a noise buffer to <br />mitigate the Project’s construction noise impacts. Moreover, if the Project site is <br />raised 6 feet, then a 6-foot sound wall will do nothing to reduce noise impacts. The <br />DEIR must be revised and recirculated to accurately characterize, analyze, and <br />mitigate significant noise impacts associated with construction and operation of the <br />Project. <br /> <br />VI. THE DEIR FAILS TO ADEQUATELY ANALYZE AND MITIGATE <br />THE PROJECT’S SIGNIFICANT CUMULATIVE IMPACTS <br /> <br />The environmental and public health impacts of the Arroyo Lago and Senior <br />East County Lakes projects will overlap in time and location, and may be significant <br />both individually and cumulatively. The DEIR fails to account for the Senior East <br />County Lakes Project in the cumulative projects analysis.137 The projects also <br /> <br />132 Toncheva Comments, p. 5. <br />133 Id. <br />134 DEIR, p. 3.12-19. <br />135 Toncheva Comments, p. 4. <br />136 DEIR, p. 3.1-16. <br />137 DEIR, Table 3-1: Cumulative Projects.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.