AGENDA FULL PACKET - Laserfiche WebLink

Tract 8724, 0 Vineyard Avenue Planning Commission Page 4 of 11 Zoning Administrator considered these issues as part of his project review, including the results of traffic analysis and City Traffic Engineer’s review, as well as input from Fire Marshal with respect to location of bollards that could help deter vehicle s from accessing the southern side of the site. As documented in the Zoning Administrator Hearing report, the tra ffic conditions, and addition of project-related traffic do not meet the warrants to allow the City to require installation of a traffic signal at this location; appropriate striping modifications and other improvement will be made to safely accommodate project traffic and pedestrian and bicycle users in accordance with the City’s standards. With respect to the positioning of bollards on the south end of the loop road, the Zoning Administrator supported the proposed site plan that includes bollards on both ends of the loop road based on its conformance to the Fire Department’s requirement for access and turnarounds for its vehicles. As noted in the findings for approval of the VTM, the subdivision design would not cause public health or safety issues. Future Dual Park Revision to VTM Based on neighborhood feedback, the applicant pursued a General Plan Amendment to allow for a split-park design. This amendment was reviewed by the Planning Commission on January 22, 2025, and approved by the City Council on February 18, 2025. The applicant submitted a revision to the project on March 12, 2025, incorporating the dual park design. Staff is currently reviewing this project, and the revised VTM will come back before the Planning Commission for approval. Although Trumark’s intent is to move forward with the dual park design, they are pursuing Tentative Map approval of the ODS, General Plan and Zoning Compliant single-park project design first in order to satisfy time-sensitive closing conditions for the purchase of the property. PUBLIC NOTICE Notice of this application was sent to surrounding property owners within a 1,000-foot radius of the site. Staff has provided the location and noticing maps as Exhibit D for reference. The public notice was also published in The Valley Times. At the time this report was prepared, no comments were received. Previously submitted neighbor comments are included as Exhibit E and discussed above with respect to the related Zoning Administrator Site Conformance review. VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FINDINGS State law and the Zoning Ordinance of the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC) set forth the considerations to be addressed in reviewing a Vesting Tentative Map. The Planning Commission must make the following findings that Vesting Tentative Map 8724 conforms to the purposes of the PMC before making its action: 1. The proposed vesting tentative subdivision map conforms to the zoning regulations/development plan.