My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
AGENDA FULL PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
03-26
>
AGENDA FULL PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 1:59:53 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:58:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/26/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Tract 8724, 0 Vineyard Avenue Planning Commission <br />Page 3 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 1: Vesting Tentative Map 8724 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br />Review of a tentative map is limited to reviewing its consistency with the approved Housing <br />Site Compliance Review project and compliance with State-mandated findings. The Vesting <br />Tentative Map is consistent with the Housing Site Compliance Review project approved by the <br />Zoning Administrator, including the following key aspects: <br /> <br />• The layout of internal streets, project vehicular access points and lots is consistent <br />with the Housing Site Compliance Review application. <br /> <br />Construction of the project would require implementation of all Conditions of Approval set forth <br />in the Housing Site Compliance Review approval for the 27-home project, and a series of <br />additional conditions are included in Exhibit A of Attachment 1 for the Vesting Tentative Map. <br />Collectively, the project, as conditioned, would allow all the requisite findings for approval of <br />the Vesting Tentative Map to be made. <br /> <br />Neighbor Comments and Issues <br />Staff acknowledges and notes previous concerns raised by neighbors with respect to issues <br />including traffic volumes and speeds on Vineyard Avenue, and the ability to make safe turns <br />from side streets. Concerns were also noted about illicit activity and loitering in the project <br />vicinity. (These issues were noted during public comments to the Planning Commission at the <br />hearing to consider the General Plan Amendment to accommodate a split park design.) The
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.