My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIAL MEETING (5:00 PM)
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
040825 SPECIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIAL MEETING (5:00 PM)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2025 4:32:18 PM
Creation date
4/8/2025 12:59:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/8/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Qy�NSA iyTo�G City Council Regular Meeting - <br />Submit your written public <br />comment <br />OPL'NNED QV City of Pleasanton <br />Full Name First Name: Mark <br />Last Name: Allendorf <br />Email (this entry is disclosable <br />if included) <br />Submitted On: <br />Apr 6, 2025, 06:04PM PDT <br />City Council Meeting Date April 08, 2025 05:00 PM <br />Meeting Type Special Meeting at 5:00 pm <br />Agenda Item Number 2 <br />Comments I have lived in Pleasanton for more than 17 years. I am proud of the <br />resources the city provides to improve the well-being of its citizens. <br />Among these is the library, which is the most used city facility, <br />serving students and adults. As such, it is an invaluable asset that <br />must be cherished and protected. One can understand that under <br />the current fiscal conditions reductions in services are perhaps <br />inevitable. Consequently, a temporary reduction in hours may be <br />necessary. <br />But a 50% reduction in library collections? How can that be justified? <br />Unlike the reduced hours, shrinking the collection could easily <br />permanently damage the facility. And who would decide what <br />resources should be cut? In an age when attacks on institutions of <br />knowledge are rampant, including the banning of books that a loud <br />minority finds offensive, such cuts raise serious concerns. Is this <br />really what we want Pleasanton to be known for? May I remind the <br />council that such actions can quickly attract national attention; <br />witness the divisive school board controversy in Sunol. The council <br />should be extremely hesitant to take actions that can bring <br />opprobrium upon the city. I urge the council to avoid this by finding <br />other ways to address the financial problem. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.