Laserfiche WebLink
Qy�NSA iyTo�G City Council Regular Meeting - <br />Submit your written public <br />comment <br />OPL'NNED QV City of Pleasanton <br />Full Name First Name: Mark <br />Last Name: Allendorf <br />Email (this entry is disclosable <br />if included) <br />Submitted On: <br />Apr 6, 2025, 06:04PM PDT <br />City Council Meeting Date April 08, 2025 05:00 PM <br />Meeting Type Special Meeting at 5:00 pm <br />Agenda Item Number 2 <br />Comments I have lived in Pleasanton for more than 17 years. I am proud of the <br />resources the city provides to improve the well-being of its citizens. <br />Among these is the library, which is the most used city facility, <br />serving students and adults. As such, it is an invaluable asset that <br />must be cherished and protected. One can understand that under <br />the current fiscal conditions reductions in services are perhaps <br />inevitable. Consequently, a temporary reduction in hours may be <br />necessary. <br />But a 50% reduction in library collections? How can that be justified? <br />Unlike the reduced hours, shrinking the collection could easily <br />permanently damage the facility. And who would decide what <br />resources should be cut? In an age when attacks on institutions of <br />knowledge are rampant, including the banning of books that a loud <br />minority finds offensive, such cuts raise serious concerns. Is this <br />really what we want Pleasanton to be known for? May I remind the <br />council that such actions can quickly attract national attention; <br />witness the divisive school board controversy in Sunol. The council <br />should be extremely hesitant to take actions that can bring <br />opprobrium upon the city. I urge the council to avoid this by finding <br />other ways to address the financial problem. <br />