Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Villages at the Quarry Project <br />Consistency Checklist 15183 Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />86 <br />resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident <br />or migratory wildlife corridors.4 However, existing stored equipment and <br />structures on-site may serve as a potential nesting location for birds. <br />Potential direct and indirect impacts could occur to resident and migratory <br />species during project construction, which would render the project <br />temporarily unsuitable for birds because of the noise, vibrations, and <br />increased activity levels associated with various construction activities. These <br />activities could potentially subject birds to risk of death or injury, and they <br />would likely avoid using the area until such construction activities have <br />dissipated or ceased. Relocation, in turn, could cause hunger or stress <br />among individual birds by displacing them into adjacent territories belonging <br />to other individuals. <br />Existing resident bird species, including killdeer, were observed on-site during <br />the April 2024 survey. These species are known to nest in disturbed, gravelly <br />areas. If project-related activities take place during the nesting season <br />(February through August), pre-construction surveys would be required prior <br />to grading and/or vegetation removal. If any bird listed under the MBTA or <br />nursery site is found within or adjacent to the project site, an adequate buffer <br />zone would be established to avoid potential impacts. Approval of the <br />proposed project would be conditioned upon compliance with <br />recommendations provided in the project-specific BRA (MM BIO-1). This <br />includes avoidance and minimization measures to riparian habitat. <br />Implementation of these conditions, including general avoidance and <br />minimization measures, would ensure that any potential biological resource <br />impacts remain less than significant as described in the Housing Element <br />Update FEIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any <br />significant environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project. <br />The proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse <br />impact that was not previously identified in the Housing Element Update FEIR. <br />e) Local Biological Resources Policies/Ordinances Consistency <br />Would the project: Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological <br />resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? <br />Summary of Housing Element Update FEIR <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR indicated that Heritage Trees are located <br />throughout the Planning Area and could be within the rezoned housing sites. <br /> <br />4 California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2024. Areas of Conservation Emphasis. Website: <br />https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/ace/. Accessed May 6, 2024.