AGENDA PACKET - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton—Villages at the Quarry Project Consistency Checklist 15183 Consistency Checklist 104 during project construction. In such a case, procedures for inadvertent discovery under federal, State, and local laws would apply. Environmental effects would be avoided by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards. Therefore, development of the site as proposed would not result in any environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project. The proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the Housing Element Update FEIR. Conclusion With regard to Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources, the Consistency Checklist demonstrates that: 1. No peculiar impacts related to the proposed project or its site have been identified. 2. There are no potentially significant off-site and/or cumulative impacts which were not discussed by the Housing Element Update FEIR. 3. No substantial new information has been identified which results in an impact which is more severe than anticipated by the Housing Element Update FEIR. 4. No mitigation measures would be required because the proposed project’s specific impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures None. Applicable General Plan Policies General Plan Program 5.1 When reviewing applications for development projects, use information regarding known archaeological finds in the Planning Area to determine whether an archaeological study, construction monitoring or other mitigations are appropriate. Require that archaeological studies meet the requirements of the CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 in identifying mitigation measures if an archaeological site is encountered. Include provisions for the interpretation of cultural resources. Consult with