My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
04-23
>
AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2025 5:17:26 PM
Creation date
4/22/2025 5:02:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/23/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
888
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Villages at the Quarry Project <br />15183 Consistency Checklist Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br /> 187 <br />New student population could also have the potential to cause the need for <br />new or expanded school facilities. As the demand for school services <br />increases from development consistent with the Housing Element Update, <br />there may be a need to increase staffing, facilities, and equipment to <br />maintain acceptable service ratios and other performance objectives for <br />schools. However, this would require existing school sites to be able to <br />accommodate the additional staff, facilities and/or equipment. If an existing <br />school site is at capacity for staffing or for students, this could require an <br />expansion of an existing school site or construction of a new school site, the <br />construction of which could cause environmental impacts. The project- <br />specific environmental impacts of constructing new or expanded school <br />facilities to support the growth anticipated as part of the Housing Element <br />Update could not be determined at the time the Housing Element Update <br />FEIR was certified because the site-specific locations and designs of future <br />new or expanded facilities are not known. It can be expected that <br />construction and operation of future new or expanded school facilities would <br />have similar impacts as would construction and operation of other types of <br />new development under the Housing Element Update. Further, PUSD would <br />be required to receive approval from the Division of the State Architect and <br />complete any required CEQA review for construction of new or expanded <br />school facilities. <br />As noted above, the payment of statutory fees “. . . is deemed to be full and <br />complete mitigation of the impacts of any legislative or adjudicative act, or <br />both, involving, but not limited to, the planning, use, or development of real <br />property. . . on the provision of adequate school facilities.” Therefore, with <br />the payment of required State-established SB 50 fees, future development <br />consistent with the Housing Element Update would not result in significant <br />adverse effects related to school facilities and impacts would be less than <br />significant. <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />The proposed project would generate increased demand for school services. <br />As stated above, the Housing Element Update estimated the development <br />of up to 760 dwelling units on the project site, which would generate <br />approximately 238 Elementary School students, approximately 106 Middle <br />School students and approximately 109 High School students. The proposed <br />project would develop 412 dwelling units and 57 JADUs, thus generating <br />fewer students than what was anticipated in the Housing Element Update <br />FEIR.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.