Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Villages at the Quarry Project <br />Consistency Checklist 15183 Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />212 <br />Potential for Site Cut Through Traffic <br />Construction of the proposed project’s internal roadways would provide a <br />new connection from Valley Avenue at Boulder Street with Busch Road at <br />Street D. As illustrated on Figure 1B of the TIA, vehicles would be able to use <br />Boulder Street, Street B, Street C, and Street D to complete this trip through <br />the site as an alternative to the Valley Avenue to Busch Road route. A travel <br />time study of these two routes was prepared to assess the attractiveness of <br />cutting through the site. The study reflects the presence of traffic circles and <br />speed humps within the project site. This study found the following results: <br />• Valley Road and Busch Road – 110 to 130 seconds <br />• Boulder Street, Street B, Street C, and Street D – 85 to 105 seconds <br /> <br />The route through the project site is approximately 25 seconds shorter than <br />the route using Valley Avenue and Busch Road. While the route through the <br />project site is quicker, it is unlikely that substantial amounts of traffic would use <br />this path. The route is indirect, involving five turns and traversing three traffic <br />circles. In addition, the number of vehicles wanting to travel between Valley <br />Avenue at Boulder Street with Busch Road at Street D is expected to be low, <br />especially with the completion of the El Charro Road extension project. <br />Stanley Boulevard to El Charro Road would be considerably faster for most <br />origins and destinations than the use of Valley Avenue and Busch Road, or a <br />cut-through trip through the project site. <br />Recommendation: Monitor peak-hour cut through traffic and implement <br />traffic calming measures to counteract the activity if it becomes an issue. <br />Traffic calming measures such as chicanes, chokers, lateral shifts, speed <br />humps or partial closures could minimize or eliminate cut through traffic. <br />a) Affect to Circulation System <br />Would the project: Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy of the circulation <br />system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian <br />facilities? <br />Summary of Housing Element Update FEIR <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR indicated that development consistent <br />with the Housing Element Update is not forecasted to generate transit, <br />roadway, bicycle, or pedestrian use that would exceed the capacity of area <br />facilities to serve that demand.