Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Villages at the Quarry Project <br />Consistency Checklist 15183 Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />232 <br />12 percent to approximately 25 percent. Without the groundwater supply, <br />there would not be enough water available to accommodate development <br />anticipated by the Housing Element Update unless alternative water supplies <br />are identified. <br />Because the City was still evaluating options for additional water and had <br />not confirmed additional supplies at the time of certification of the Housing <br />Element Update FEIR, the potential water supply deficiency was considered <br />significant and unavoidable. <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR noted that the analysis reflected a <br />conservative approach, and likely overreported the deficit; nevertheless, <br />because supply replacement options had not been confirmed and a final <br />decision had not been made to replace the groundwater supply, the <br />Housing Element Update FEIR concluded that the City’s projected water <br />supply would not be sufficient to accommodate development consistent <br />with the Housing Element Update, and that no mitigation is available that <br />could, with certainty, reduce impacts to a less than significant level. <br />Therefore, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable. <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />A Hydraulic Analysis (Appendix G) was prepared for the proposed project by <br />Akel Engineering Group, Inc., in July 2024. The Hydraulic Analysis determined <br />that the proposed project would have an average day demand of <br />approximately 128 gpm and a maximum day demand of approximately 224 <br />gpm. <br />The City continues to evaluate options for alternative water supply sources, <br />but the City currently obtains water from Zone 7 from available excess <br />supplies on a temporary basis. However, as described in Section XIV, <br />Population and Housing, the proposed project would construct fewer units <br />than what was assumed in the Housing Element Update FEIR. Therefore, the <br />proposed project would generate less demand for potable water than what <br />was assumed in the Housing Element Update FEIR. Therefore, there are no <br />environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project. The <br />proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact <br />that was not previously identified in the Housing Element Update FEIR. <br />d, e) Solid Waste Reduction Goals and Regulations Consistency