My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
051325 SPECIAL
>
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2025 2:52:49 PM
Creation date
5/14/2025 10:07:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/13/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1730 MADISON ROAD • CINCINNATI, OH 45206 • 513 861 5400 • FAX 513 861 3480 MANAGEMENTPARTNERS.COM <br />2107 NORTH FIRST STREET, SUITE 470 • SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95131 • 408 437 5400 • FAX 408 453 6191 <br />3152 RED HILL AVENUE, SUITE 210 • COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626 • 949 222 1082 • FAX 408 453 6191 <br />To: Mr. Nelson Fialho, City Manager, City of Pleasanton <br />Mr. David Haglund, Superintendent, Pleasanton Unified School District <br />From: Jan Perkins, Senior Partner <br />Mary Neilan, Senior Manager <br />Subject: Preliminary Issues Assessment Regarding Potential Co-Location of <br />Pleasanton Unified School District/City of Pleasanton Maintenance Facilities <br />Date: September 24, 2018 <br />Executive Summary <br />Management Partners was engaged by the City of Pleasanton and the Pleasanton Unified <br />School District to assist with a preliminary issues assessment of a proposal to co-locate the <br />School District’s maintenance facility on city property where city maintenance operations are <br />also headquartered. The District finds it may have better uses for the property on which its <br />current maintenance facility is located, and both City and District leaders believe there could be <br />benefits from co-locating maintenance facilities. A preliminary assessment of the feasibility as <br />well as a greater understanding of the pros and cons of such co-location are desired to <br />determine whether a business plan should be developed. <br />Two meetings with City and District staff were held as part of this preliminary issues <br />assessment. The first was on April 26, 2018, during which representatives of the City and <br />District identified the reasons for studying the feasibility of co-locating the maintenance <br />facilities. The second was on August 9, 2018 for the purpose of discussing Management <br />Partners’ draft analysis and next steps. <br />This report summarizes the key policy issues, identifies 16 key questions for the parties to <br />consider, presents four case studies of similar partnerships between public agencies , outlines an <br />approach for a full feasibility study should one be undertaken, and recommends next steps. <br />Key Policy Questions <br />The policy questions identified by City and School District staff as a result of this preliminary <br />issues assessment are as follows: <br />1.Is co-location of District maintenance functions at the City’s Operations Services Center <br />site feasible? <br />Summary answer: Yes, but more detail is necessary. Since this was a preliminary assessment, <br />numerous issues and questions were identified that first must be addressed before this
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.