My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
060325 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2025 11:40:48 AM
Creation date
7/15/2025 11:39:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/3/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
226
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 7 of 10 <br />expresses concern about an employee's conduct. Generally, a supervisor reviews and <br />investigates each complaint, which is then reviewed by the unit manager, a command officer, <br />and the Chief of Police for impartiality, thoroughness, and accuracy. Depending on the scope <br />and severity of the allegations, the Chief of Police in conjunction with the City’s Human <br />Resources Department, may opt to contract with an outside investigator. <br /> <br />At the conclusion of the investigation, each allegation of a policy violation will be assigned one <br />of four possible findings. The finding options are unfounded, not sustained, sustained or <br />exonerated. An “unfounded” finding means the alleged conduct did not occur. A finding of <br />“sustained” means the conduct did occur and resulted in a policy violation. A “not sustained” <br />finding is assigned when there is not enough evidence to determine if a policy violation did or <br />did not occur. An employee is “exonerated” when the conduct did occur, and that conduct was <br />proper and within policy. <br /> <br />Table 9 below illustrates the total number of internally and externally generated complaints <br />from 2020–2024. <br /> <br />Personnel Complaints <br />During the identified timeframe, the most frequently sustained complaint was internally <br />generated. The use of body-worn cameras has a significant impact to the outcome of citizen- <br />generated complaints. While some complaints may not be sustained for policy violations, the <br />police department takes every complaint seriously and as an opportunity to better the <br />profession and the services it provides. <br /> <br />Table 9 - Internally and Externally Generated Complaints 2020-2024 <br /> <br /> 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024* <br />Internal 3 8 5 2 9 <br />Citizen 5 3 4 6 10 <br />Total 8 11 9 8 19 <br />Sustained 1 6 4 2 7 <br />*Three cases pending as not all investigations have been completed <br /> <br />Clearance Rates <br />In 2024, the police department cleared 93% of violent crimes, and cleared well above the <br />national average in all violent crime areas. Property crime clearance remained comparable to <br />the three-year average at 21%, These numbers reflect the hard work of the investigative <br />teams, especially in complex violent cases, and reinforce the department's commitment to <br />holding offenders accountable. The police department looks forward to utilizing additional <br />technological resources to improve clearance rates, especially as they relate to property crime. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Page 182 of 226
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.