Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 of 9 <br />employee per 300 to 400 square feet, compared to one per 250 square feet for office <br /> <br />Pleasanton is well-positioned to attract new IBBs, with a solid and diverse industrial base and <br />5.2 million square feet of current inventory. Unfortunately, Chapter 18 Zoning of the PMC is <br />outdated, and as a result, it may create unnecessary barriers to IBBs that may impede this <br />type of new investment in Pleasanton. <br /> <br />Many of the IBBs noted above have specific facility requirements and typically need to build <br />out their new space/facilities within a very tight schedule, because of the nature of their <br />investment/capital funding and business models. Thus, cities that can offer them expedited <br />review, certainty, and accommodation during the approval process are much more attractive <br />locations for investment. Conversely, IBBs avoid locating where the zoning requirements could <br />cause unnecessary delays, uncertainty, or impose unreasonable requirements that create <br />barriers to investment. <br /> <br />In 2023, the City Council, as part of their adoption of the updated Economic Development <br />Strategic Plan (EDSP), approved a major initiative to attract the Life Sciences/Biotechnology <br />sector and modernize the City’s Zoning and permit process to reduce regulatory barriers for <br />those businesses. This initiative appears as Initiative 5.1 within the EDSP. In March, 2025, the <br />City Council affirmed seven priority strategies for the 2025/26 Fiscal Year from the ONE <br />Pleasanton Strategic Plan, including a focus on Economic Development and, specifically, <br />Strategic Plan Goal E, Strategy 4 to implement the EDSP. <br /> <br />As outlined in the July 23, 2025, Planning Commission Agenda Report (Attachment 2), staff <br />worked with life sciences industry consultant Alex Greenwood Group to evaluate Pleasanton’s <br />current zoning and identify updates to better support biotechnology and other IBBs. <br /> <br />The review included: <br />• Analyzing current industrial zoning for clarity and efficiency <br />• Comparing Pleasanton’s zoning with industry needs against other successful cities that <br />have successfully attracted IBB uses <br />• Gathering input from local businesses and community leaders <br /> <br />The assessment identified several issues that limit Pleasanton’s ability to attract and support <br />IBBs as follows: <br />• Outdated land use definitions that don’t account for newer innovation-based industries <br />• Some zoning districts require unnecessary conditional use permits for low-impact <br />businesses <br />• Restrictions on complementary uses, like hotels, may limit business potential <br />• Heavy reliance on PUD’s makes zoning unclear <br />• There is no online, interactive zoning map for easy research by businesses <br />• Development standards (height, setbacks, parking) need updating to reflect current <br />industry needs <br />• The PMC unnecessarily triggers Design Review in many cases <br />Page 47 of 674