My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
061725 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2025 11:01:17 AM
Creation date
8/13/2025 10:54:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/17/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
864
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 3 of 7 <br />differently, common elements include the collection of an in-lieu fee for public art based on a <br />percentage of construction valuation; the option to provide on-site public art, subject to specified <br />criteria, to meet the program's requirements; and exemptions for certain types of projects. <br /> <br />While any public art contribution will ideally be structured in a manner that is financially feasible for <br />development projects, per guidance from the City's consultant, Economic and Planning Systems <br />(EPS), there is no nexus study requirement for a public art contribution or related in-lieu fee. The <br />contribution can be adopted by ordinance, with in-lieu fees adopted by City Council Resolution, to <br />be included in the City’s Master Fee Schedule. As shown in Table 1, neighboring cities have <br />established this fee at between 0.45 percent and 1.0 percent of the project's construction (permit) <br />valuation. <br /> <br />Public art projects and programs are complex efforts that involve many stakeholders and staff to <br />create a program that works for the community. It is essential to develope clear expectations, <br />ordinances, and guidelines around the program's scope and purpose, guidance for program <br />administration, criteria for what qualifies as a bona fide public art installation on private property, <br />and allowable use/purpose of funds collected. <br /> <br /> Table 1: Comparison of Cities' Percent for Public Art Programs <br /> Dublin Livermore San Ramon <br />Fee <br />Equivalent • 0.5 percent of <br />the construction <br />value for non- <br />residential <br />buildings over <br />50,000 sq feet <br />and residential <br />projects of <br />more than 20 <br />units. <br /> <br />• 0.45 percent for <br />non-residential <br />buildings less <br />than 50,000 sq <br />feet. <br /> <br />• Not less than the <br />program <br />allocation <br />amount for the <br />acquisition and <br />installation of <br />public art in the <br />private <br />development <br />project. The <br />amount is <br />determined by <br />the Building <br />Official. <br />• 1 percent of the <br />construction valuation, <br />as determined by the <br />Building Official, for new <br />residential and <br />commercial <br />development. <br />• 0.5 percent of the <br />construction valuation, <br />as determined by the <br />Building Official for new <br />residential and <br />commercial development <br />additions/alterations to <br />existing residential and <br />commercial <br />development. <br />Exemptions <br />• Low-income <br />housing <br />facilities and <br />community- <br />serving non- <br />• Remodeling, <br />repairing, or <br />reconstructing <br />structures <br />damaged by fire, <br />• Residential development <br />of less than 10 units. <br />• Additions/alterations of <br />an existing commercial <br />development less than <br />Page 164 of 864
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.