My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2025054
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2025
>
RES 2025054
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2025 4:05:15 PM
Creation date
9/25/2025 1:49:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/16/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
2025-054
DOCUMENT NAME
URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN, CIP 22773
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
494
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
aA <br />URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES <br />1.2 City Resources <br />1.2.1 Budget <br />Knowing where you are starting from is the first step in being <br />able to plan for the future. This section highlights where <br />and how much of the City's budget (on average) is spent on <br />the maintenance and management of Pleasanton's urban <br />forest. Table 1-1 shows the total expenditures on tree care. <br />Pleasanton's average annual urban forest program spending <br />over the last six fiscal years was rough $1.2 million, which <br />when divided by the City's most recent tree inventory of <br />23,348 trees, equates to spending roughly $51.74 per tree <br />Table 1-2 shows a comparison of what other California cities <br />of both similar and larger size spend on the management of <br />their public trees which ranges from $26 per tree in Napa to <br />over change to say over $84 per in Rancho Cordova. There <br />are many unique factors for each city in managing their <br />urban forests which makes it challenging to directly compare <br />one city's per -tree budget to another city, so a more useful <br />metric comes from looking at what services Pleasanton is <br />accomplishing with the funding it spends on its public trees. <br />This is discussed further in Section 1.2.3 Annual Service <br />Data. The increasing amount spent over the last four years by <br />Pleasanton, a difference of over $687,200 when comparing <br />the spending in FY 23/24 compared to FY 20/21, is due in <br />part to extensive damage to trees caused by the previous <br />88 1 CITY OF PLEASANTON URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN <br />winter's large storms, and also due in part to the rising costs <br />of tree establishment, and maintenance work combined with <br />the City's desire to maintain the same level of tree services <br />each year. While the current urban forestry program spending <br />is adequate to maintain the City's existing public trees in a <br />healthy and safe condition, it is isn't enough to also grow the <br />City's urban forest and meet the new canopy cover goal which <br />is discussed further in the next section. <br />Table 1-1. Total Urban Forest Activity Expenditure by <br />Fiscal Year <br />FY 23/24 $1,604,187 <br />FY 22/23 $1,514,107 <br />FY 21/22 $1,200,273 <br />FY 20/21 $916,987 <br />FY 19/20 $1,o89,017 <br />FY 18/19 $922,925 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.