Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve <br />Draft EIR Environmental Impact Analysis <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 3-3 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/3 - Draft EIR/21480016 Sec03-00 Env Impact Analysis.docx <br />Code Environmental Issue <br />HAZ Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br />HYD Hydrology and Water Quality <br />LAND Land Use <br />NOI Noise <br />PUB Public Services <br />REC Recreation <br />TRANS Transportation <br />UTIL Utilities and Service Systems <br />WILD Wildfire <br /> <br />Cumulative Effects <br />CEQA Guidelines Section 15130 requires the consideration of cumulative impacts within an EIR when <br />a project’s incremental effects are cumulatively considerable. According to CEQA, “. . . the <br />incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the <br />effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future <br />projects.” In identifying projects that may contribute to cumulative impacts, CEQA allows the use of a <br />list of past, present, and reasonably anticipated future projects which have the potential to result in <br />related or cumulative impacts, including those which are outside of the control of the lead agency. <br />In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(b), “. . . the discussion of cumulative impacts <br />shall reflect the severity of the impacts and their likelihood of occurrence, the discussion need not <br />provide as great [a level of] detail as is provided for the effects attributable to the project alone.” The <br />discussion should be guided by standards of practicality and reasonableness, and it should focus on <br />the cumulative impact to which the identified other projects contribute rather than on the attributes <br />of other projects that do not contribute to the cumulative impact. <br />The proposed project’s cumulative impacts were considered in conjunction with other proposed and <br />approved projects in the vicinity of the project site, including the County of Alameda (County) and <br />the City of Pleasanton (City). <br />3.1.1 - Cumulative Project List <br />Although the physical conditions existing when the NOP is published normally are used to establish <br />the baseline for the analysis of cumulative impacts (CEQA Guideline § 15125 (a)(1)), the City has sole <br />discretion to determine which projects to include in a cumulative impact project list. In exercising its <br />discretion, the City is guided by the basic standard that the cumulative list should include projects <br />when it is reasonable, feasible, and practical to do so, given the information available about the <br />projects, and when failure to include such projects would lead to an inadequate analysis of the <br />severity and significance of the cumulative impacts in question. Golden Door Props., LLC v. County of <br />San Diego (2020) 50 CA5th 467, 529. The City also notes that the CEQA Guidelines specify that