My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_DEIR
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
12-10
>
ITEM 5 EXHIBIT A
>
_DEIR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2025 3:54:34 PM
Creation date
12/2/2025 3:49:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
586
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve <br />Biological Resources Draft EIR <br /> <br /> <br />3.3-26 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/3 - Draft EIR/21480016 Sec03-03 Bio Resources.docx <br />the majority of which is contiguous with other open space lands to the north, south, and west. This <br />on-site preserved open space will include a mosaic of habitat types including approximately 64 acres <br />of California annual grassland, 24 acres of mixed riparian woodland, eight acres of oak woodland, <br />and almost 2 acres of chaparral. This conservation land avoids and minimizes impacts to CRLF <br />habitat. <br />Therefore, project plans would result in a less than significant impact on CRLF upland, movement, <br />and foraging habitat. Although the loss of habitat would be less than significant, the proposed <br />project will result in some impacts to areas in proximity to the riparian corridors and harm or <br />mortality to individual CRLF could occur during project construction activities should CRLF be present <br />in these areas. Harm or mortality to individual CRLF would be considered a significant impact. <br />However, with implementation of MM BIO-1b, which requires avoidance, minimization, and <br />compensatory measures, impacts to this species would be lowered to a less than significant level <br />under CEQA. <br />Alameda Whipsnake <br />The project site is located almost entirely within Critical Habitat for the Alameda whipsnake, and the <br />proposed project would result in the loss of approximately 24 acres of upland habitat within the <br />grading envelope that is suitable for all life stages of the whipsnake. Additionally, suitable habitat for <br />the Alameda whipsnake exists immediately adjacent to the project’s boundaries. Therefore, the <br />proposed project would result in the loss of approximately 24 acres of habitat for this species and <br />could result in harm or mortality to individuals of this species, should they occur on the site during <br />project construction activities. The loss of habitat and the potential harm or mortality to individuals <br />of this species would be considered a significant impact of the proposed project. However, with <br />implementation of MM BIO-1c, which requires avoidance, minimization, and compensatory <br />measures, impacts to this species would be lowered to a less than significant level under CEQA. <br />Nesting Birds <br />Trees throughout the oak woodland and riparian woodland habitats of the project site and lone <br />trees within the grasslands of the site provide suitable nesting habitat for tree-nesting raptors and <br />migratory birds, including special-status species such as the white-tailed kite, northern harrier, and <br />golden eagle. If a raptor or other migratory bird, regardless of its federal or State status, were to nest <br />on or adjacent to the site prior to or during proposed construction activities, such activities could <br />result in the abandonment of active nests or result in direct mortality to these birds. Construction <br />activities that adversely affect the nesting success of raptors or result in mortality of individual birds <br />would constitute a violation of State and federal laws and would be considered a potentially <br />significant impact under CEQA. However, with implementation of MM BIO-1d, which requires pre- <br />construction surveys, impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level under CEQA. <br />American Badger <br />The project site provides potential denning and foraging habitat for badgers. The proposed project <br />would preserve in perpetuity 104.6 acres of the site as open space. This amount of open space <br />would more than sufficiently compensate for any loss of badger habitat. Although the loss of such <br />habitat would be a less than significant impact due to the availability of such habitat in the region
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.