Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve <br />Draft EIR Biological Resources <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 3.3-27 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/3 - Draft EIR/21480016 Sec03-03 Bio Resources.docx <br />and the proposed in-perpetuity preservation of 104.6 acres of habitat on the site outside of the <br />grading envelope, should badgers occur on the site during project ground-disturbing activities, these <br />activities could result in harm or mortality to individual badgers, and this would be a potentially <br />significant impact. However, with the avoidance, minimization, and compensation measures <br />provided in MM BIO-1e, impacts to badgers would be reduced to a less than significant level under <br />CEQA. <br />Crotch’s Bumble Bee <br />There is a possibility the Crotch’s bumble bee occurs on the project site. If the species occurs on-site <br />and there is a nest underground, project-related demolition, excavation, and grading activities could <br />result in loss of individuals. Loss of underground nests or individual bees may be considered a <br />significant impact to Crotch’s bumble bee. Accordingly, the proposed project may have a potentially <br />significant impact. The preferred approach is to avoid and minimize impacts to them. However, if <br />avoidance and minimization is not feasible, then the proposed project would need to compensate <br />for the loss of habitat either on or off-site. This would likely also necessitate the need for the <br />proposed project to obtain an Incidental Take Permit from CDFW. Therefore, the project applicant <br />should conduct pre-activity surveys for the Crotch’s bumble bee prior to ground disturbance. Harm <br />or mortality to individual Crotch would be considered a significant impact. However, with <br />implementation of MM BIO-1f, which requires pre-activity surveys and avoidance, minimization, and <br />compensatory measures, impacts would be reduced to less than significant under CEQA. <br />San Francisco Dusky-footed Woodrats <br />The riparian woodlands provide potentially suitable habitat for this species. However, no woodrat <br />nests were observed during the site visit. Should woodrats occur on the project site during project <br />ground-disturbing activities, these activities could result in harm or mortality to individual woodrats, <br />and this would be a potentially significant impact. MM BIO-1g which requires avoidance, <br />minimization, and compensation measures would reduce impacts to San Francisco dusky-footed <br />woodrats to a less than significant level under CEQA. <br />Ringtails <br />Suitable habitat is restricted to the riparian woodlands on-site. The ringtail could occur within the <br />riparian corridor habitat of the project site. Should ringtails occur on the site during project ground- <br />disturbing activities, these activities could result in harm or mortality to individual ringtails. <br />Therefore, there is a small chance site development may result in direct mortality or injury to any <br />ringtail individuals adjacent to the riparian habitat. Direct mortality or injury to an individual ringtail <br />would be considered a significant impact under CEQA. However, measures described in MM BIO-1h <br />would be implemented that would avoid impacts to individual ringtails and therefore reduce impacts <br />to a less than significant level under CEQA. <br />Burrowing Owl <br />The project site does contain some suitable habitat to support this species in the form of California <br />annual grassland. No burrowing owls have ever been documented on-site during numerous surveys <br />since 2014. The closest sightings are about 2.7 miles east of the site in the Dublin region east of <br />Doughtery Road and about 2.5 miles south of the site along Pleasanton Ridge. No burrowing owls