My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_DEIR
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
12-10
>
ITEM 5 EXHIBIT A
>
_DEIR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2025 3:54:34 PM
Creation date
12/2/2025 3:49:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
586
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve <br />Draft EIR Biological Resources <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 3.3-43 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/3 - Draft EIR/21480016 Sec03-03 Bio Resources.docx <br />• Identify adaptive management procedures that accommodate uncertainty that <br />comes with wetland creation projects. These include (but are not limited to) <br />measures to address colonization by invasive species, unexpected lack of water, <br />excessive foraging of installed wetland plants by wildlife, etc. <br />• Define management and maintenance activities (weeding, repair of water delivery <br />systems and browsing protection, etc.). <br />• Provide for surety in funding for MMP and for in-perpetuity preservation and <br />management of created wetland habitats. <br /> <br />Level of Significance After Mitigation <br />Less than significant impact. <br />Fish and Wildlife Movement Corridors <br />Impact BIO-4: The proposed project would not interfere substantially with the movement of any <br />native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native <br />resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites. <br />Impact Analysis <br />The proposed conservation area contains grassland, mixed oak woodland, and mixed riparian <br />woodland. Because the conservation area supports a mosaic of habitats that can be used by many <br />different types of species, the conservation area is likely to act as a movement corridor for more <br />species than other areas supporting a single habitat type. The mosaic of habitats within the <br />proposed conservation area would help to facilitate the movement of wildlife regionally through a <br />known important wildlife linkage/corridor and likely acts as core habitat for multiple regional <br />species. Expanding protected open space in the local vicinity of the project site in the form of the <br />proposed conservation area would help to maintain a portion of this wildlife linkage/corridor in <br />perpetuity. <br />However, the project as proposed will preserve approximately 104.6 acres of on-site land outside of <br />the grading envelope which includes a mosaic of grassland, oak woodland, and riparian <br />woodland/aquatic habitats, much of which is contiguous with other off-site open space to the north, <br />west, and south of the project site, while impacting approximately 24 acres of primarily grassland <br />habitat that is mostly concentrated in the eastern portion of the project site and closer to existing <br />off-site development. After this area is developed, large areas of grassland habitats in surrounding <br />lands will remain. Native wildlife currently using the creek corridors on the project site during <br />movement and foraging activities will likely continue to use these corridors. This suggests that the <br />proposed project, when considered by itself, will neither result in a wildlife population dropping <br />below self-sustaining levels nor threaten to eliminate an animal community nor result in an <br />impediment to movement between habitats on and off-site. The preservation of approximately <br />104.6 acres of habitats that include the most important contiguous habitat and movement corridors, <br />would compensate for the loss of 23.89 acres of habitat impacted by development. Therefore, <br />impacts to native wildlife due to the loss of habitat resulting from the proposed project are <br />considered less than significant under CEQA.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.