My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_DEIR
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
12-10
>
ITEM 5 EXHIBIT A
>
_DEIR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2025 3:54:34 PM
Creation date
12/2/2025 3:49:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
586
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve <br />Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources Draft EIR <br /> <br /> <br />3.4-32 FirstCarbon Solutions <br /> https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/3 - Draft EIR/21480016 Sec03-04 Cultural-Tribal Cultural Resources.docx <br />Future development within the cumulative geographic scope could have significant cumulative <br />impacts on known or previously unidentified cultural resources and TCRs. However, development <br />within the cumulative geographic context would be required to comply with federal, State, and local <br />laws and policies that protect cultural resources and TCRs, including the provisions of Senate Bill (SB) <br />18 and Assembly Bill (AB) 52, Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, Section 7050.5 of the <br />California Health and Safety Code, and Sections 5024.1 and 5097 of the Public Resources Code which <br />would sufficiently reduce impacts. Compliance with these policies may also require development <br />projects to prepare site-specific project-level analyses to fulfill CEQA requirements, which also would <br />include additional consultation that could lead to the identification of potential site-specific cultural <br />resources and TCRs. Accordingly, cumulative development would be required to comply with long- <br />term planning documents, and regulatory agency policies (including, but not limited to, standard <br />conditions of approval, evaluation requirements and inadvertent discovery procedures) that reduce <br />impacts to potential cultural resources and TCRs. Accordingly potential cumulative impacts to <br />cultural resources and TCRs would be reduced to the maximum extent practicable; however, <br />cumulative impacts would remain potentially significant. <br />With adherence to all applicable regulations, including the City’s standard conditions of approval and <br />implementation of the mitigation proposed herein, the proposed project’s incremental contribution <br />to potential cumulative impacts would not be significant. MM CUL-2a would require that specific <br />procedures be followed in the case of inadvertent discovery of historic or pre-contact resources. <br />Level of Cumulative Significance Before Mitigation <br />Less than significant impact. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />None.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.