Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve <br />Draft EIR Geology, Soils, and Seismicity <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 3.6-23 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/3 - Draft EIR/21480016 Sec03-06 Geology.docx <br />3.6.4 - Methodology <br />Impacts related to geology and soils were determined by reviewing a variety of databases, web <br />maps, the Updated Geotechnical and Geologic Report by Cornerstone Earth Group and Update <br />Geotechnical Review provided by Ninyo and Moore which is provided in Appendix E. Information on <br />existing soils on the project site was provided by the Updated Geotechnical and Geologic Report, the <br />Update Geotechnical Review, and the Web Soil Survey from the United States Department of <br />Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). Information on subsurface <br />conditions including groundwater, subsidence, expansive, and collapsible soil were obtained by the <br />Updated Geotechnical and Geologic Report and other supplemental resources from the California <br />Department of Water Resources (CDWR), USGS, and the California Department of Transportation <br />(Caltrans). <br />Information on seismic-related hazards was provided by the Updated Geotechnical and Geologic <br />Report and Geotechnical Review. Further analysis was performed by evaluating web maps from the <br />California Department of Conservation and CGS-provided web maps to determine whether the <br />project site was delineated within a Special Study Zone under the Alquist-Priolo Fault Zoning Act, or <br />other zones of required investigation for liquefaction or landslides. Details on the major fault lines in <br />the region were evaluated through reviewing reports on fault segments from the Quaternary Fault <br />and Fold Database of the United States. <br />The Assessment of the Paleontological Potential of Rock Units within the SVP Standard Guidelines <br />was compared to the rock units underlaying the project site to determine the potential for <br />uncovering significant paleontological resources during the construction phase of the proposed <br />project. The UCMP Locality Search was utilized to identify vertebrate, invertebrate, plant, and <br />microfossil localities uncovered in Alameda County that either were discovered in the same rock <br />units situated on the project site or that were designated a locality name that matches the <br />geography of the project area. In addition, a records search request was submitted to the UCMP on <br />March 6, 2025, and completed on March 25, 2025, to obtain complete information on vertebrate <br />and invertebrate localities uncovered in the Miocene-age rock units in the project region. The <br />objective of the UCMP Locality Search and records search requests was to determine the potential of <br />ground-disturbing activities during construction of the proposed project to uncover any significant <br />paleontological resources. <br />3.6.5 - Thresholds of Significance <br />The lead agency utilizes the criteria in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines <br />Appendix G Environmental Checklist to establish thresholds of significance to determine whether <br />impacts to geology, soils, seismicity and paleontological resources are significant environmental effects. <br />As such, the City has determined that the proposed project would have a potential impact if it would: <br />a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, <br />injury or death involving: <br />i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo <br />Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on