My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_DEIR
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
12-10
>
ITEM 5 EXHIBIT A
>
_DEIR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2025 3:54:34 PM
Creation date
12/2/2025 3:49:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
586
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve <br />Geology, Soils, and Seismicity Draft EIR <br /> <br /> <br />3.6-24 FirstCarbon Solutions <br /> https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/3 - Draft EIR/21480016 Sec03-06 Geology.docx <br />other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology <br />Special Publication 42. <br />ii. Strong seismic ground shaking. <br />iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction. <br />iv. Landslides. <br />b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. <br />c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a <br />result of the proposed project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral <br />spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. <br />d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), <br />creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property. <br />e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative <br />wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater. <br />f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic <br />feature. <br /> <br />3.6.6 - Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures <br />This section discusses potential impacts associated with the proposed project and provides <br />mitigation measures where necessary. <br />Earthquakes <br />Impact GEO-1: The proposed project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial <br />adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: <br /> i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent <br />Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for <br />the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to <br />Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. <br /> ii) Strong seismic ground shaking. <br /> iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction. <br /> iv) Landslides. <br />Impact Analysis <br />Construction and Operation <br />i) Fault Rupture <br />The project site is located in an area of high seismicity, as is all the San Francisco Bay Area. The <br />project site is traversed by northwest trending fault lines with one subsidiary fault south of the <br />project site. However, the fault lines on the project site cut through Tertiary rock units and do not <br />transect Quaternary rock units younger than 11,000 years old. As such, the fault lines on the project <br />site are considered inactive and are not designated within a Special Study Zone under the Alquist- <br />Priolo Fault Zoning Act. The closest Special Study Zone is along the Calaveras Fault, which is
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.