Laserfiche WebLink
Appendix E. Continued <br />East Alameda County Conservation Strategy E-5 October 2010 <br />ICF 00906.08 <br />Table E-5. Impact/Mitigation Scoring for California red-legged frog in the EACCS study area. <br />California red-legged frog 5 4 3 2 1 0 Score <br />Closest suitable breeding habitat to <br />site On-site < 1-mile <br />>1-mile but < <br />2-miles ----Greater than 2- <br />miles <br />Is there occupied habitat within 2- <br />miles of site?Yes ----No ---- <br />Aquatic land covers impacted/ <br />mitigated <br />Wetland, <br />Ponds, <br />Stream/River <br />--------All others; <br />none <br />Upland land covers impacted/ <br />mitigated <br />Riparian, <br />Grassland, <br />Oak woodland, <br />Rural <br />residential <br />Chaparral/ <br />Scrub <br />Conifer <br />woodland <br />Cultivated ag, <br />ruderal --All others; <br />none <br />Elevation Below 3,500 <br />feet --------Above 3,500 <br />feet <br />Presence of ground squirrels or <br />other burrowing mammals On site < 0.25-mile of <br />site <br />> 0.25 but <br />0.5 miles <br />> 0. 5 but <br />1.0 miles <br />> 1.0 but <br />miles > 1.5 miles <br />Presence of bullfrogs or non-native <br />fish in aquatic resources on site <br />No -- <br />Low numbers <br />and not all <br />aquatic <br />habitats are <br />occupied <br />-- <br />Yes, occurring <br />in high <br />numbers <br />-- <br />Create a new barrier between <br />breeding and upland habitat <br />Documented <br />breeding <br />location <br />-- <br />Potential <br />breeding <br />location <br />----No <br />Protect linkage between breeding <br />and upland habitat <br />Documented <br />breeding <br />location <br />-- <br />Potential <br />breeding <br />location <br />----No <br />Inside East San Francisco Bay core <br />recovery area Yes No <br />Inside designated Critical Habitat Yes --------No <br />On parcels with an approved <br />management plan for this species.Yes ------No -- <br />Total Score <br />Note: The ratio of mitigation to impact depends on the location of the mitigation. The acres of mitigation for a given project would be determined using the ratios <br />shown in Table 3-7. Habitat quality of the impact site and the mitigation site would be scored using this table. <br />Impact/Conserve <br />4/4 <br />5/5 <br />5/5 <br />5,4/5,4 <br />5/5 <br />< < <1.5 5/5 <br />5/5 <br />0/0 <br />0/0 <br />0/0 <br />5/5 <br />1/1 <br />44/44 <br />Notes: The vast majority of Critical Habitat noted here is on proposed conservation land.