Laserfiche WebLink
Appendix E. Continued <br />East Alameda County Conservation Strategy E-7 October 2010 <br />ICF 00906.08 <br />Table E-7. Impact/Mitigation Scoring for Alameda whipsnake in the EACCS study area. <br />Alameda whipsnake 5 4 3 2 1 0 Score <br />Inside Core Recovery Unit <br />reported in draft Recovery Plan Yes --------No <br />Inside designated Critical Habitat Yes --------No <br />High quality shrub habitat <br />(scrub/chaparral especially; on <br />northeast, east, south east, south <br />and southwest <br />Aspects) within one mile of subject <br />site <br />Yes ------No -- <br />Land covers impacted/ <br />mitigated Chaparral/ <br />Scrub <br />Grassland, <br />Oak Woodland Riparian Conifer <br />Woodland --All others <br />Presence of rock outcrops On-site -mile 1- <br />mile ----> 1 mile <br />Presence of important movement <br />corridor reported in draft Recovery <br />Plan <br />On-site -mile 1- <br />mile ----> 1 mile <br />On parcels with an approved <br />management plan for this species.Yes ------No -- <br />Total Score <br />Note: The ratio of mitigation to impact depends on the location of the mitigation. The acres of mitigation for a given project would be determined using the ratios <br />shown in Table 3-9. Habitat quality of the impact site and the mitigation site would be scored using this table. <br /> <br />I I l I I I I I 7 <br />- <br />0/0 <br />-5/5 <br />5/5 <br />5,4,3/5,4,3 <br /><0.5 >0.5 but< 4/5 <br /><0.5 > 0.5 but< 0/0 <br />- <br />1/1 <br />I I I I I I I 27/28 <br />~ _J