My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2025-16
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
PC-2025-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2025 10:30:44 AM
Creation date
12/23/2025 10:28:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/23/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
277
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Hana Japan Steak House 5150.100.001 <br />11991 Dublin Canyon Road November 11, 2024 <br />RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Page 5 <br /> <br />EXHIBIT 1: Site Plan with Previous Borings and Elevations <br /> <br /> <br />Comment 14 Geotechnical Report, Section 6.5 (Acceptable Fill): <br />This section states that on-site soil and rock material is suitable as fill material. However, previous <br />sections have indicated that the on-site soil consists of expansive soil and that expansive clay should <br />not be placed within the upper 3 feet of building pads. Consideration should be given to clarifying what <br />on-site soil and rock is acceptable as fill material or clarifying where it can be used. In addition, this <br />section indicated that fill material should have a plasticity index of less than 12. Clarification should be <br />given to whether this refers to on-site soil or imported fill. <br /> <br />ENGEO Response to Comment 14 <br />We will clarify this in the Reference 2 update. Note that the building pads will be cut pads, so limited <br />if any fill would be placed in the building pads. The clarification will be as per Response to <br />Comment 13. <br /> <br />Comment 15 Geotechnical Report, Section 6.6.2.2 (Structural Areas) Note 2: <br />It appears that the second sentence in this note is incomplete. Please provide clarification if <br />appropriate. <br /> <br />ENGEO Response to Comment 15 <br />We will address this in the Reference 2 update. <br /> <br />Comment 16 Geotechnical Report, Section 6.6.2.2 (Structural Areas): <br />Consideration should be given to eliminating the option to use native clay soils for pipe bedding and <br />backfill where utility trenches cross perimeter building foundations. Consideration should be given to <br />only recommending sand cement slurry for this purpose because it is very difficult to properly compact <br />clayey soils under the pipe haunches. <br /> <br />ENGEO Response to Comment 16 <br />We have success with this recommendation; we will leave this portion of the report as is.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.