My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2025-16
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
PC-2025-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2025 10:30:44 AM
Creation date
12/23/2025 10:28:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/23/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
277
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Hana Japan Restaurant Project <br />Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />72 <br />May 2025 <br />VMT analysis.43 The LCI screening threshold recommendations are based on project size, <br />maps, transit availability, and provision of affordable housing. One of the criteria in the <br />Technical Advisory is that local-serving retail developments (i.e., developments less than <br />50,000 sf in size) may be assumed to result in a less-than-significant impact on VMT <br />because improving destination proximity by adding retail opportunities into the urban fabric <br />tends to shorten trips and reduce VMT. <br /> <br />The proposed project would include the development of a single-story, 6,445-sf <br />teppanyaki restaurant. Because the proposed project would include commercial uses less <br />than 50,000 sf, the proposed project can be presumed to be a local-serving facility and, <br />as such, would not have a significant impact related to VMT. <br /> <br />Based on the above, the proposed project is consistent with the LCI screening criteria and <br />would not conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b). Therefore, <br />a less-than-significant impact would occur. <br /> <br />c,d. Access to the project site would be provided by a repaved driveway at the westernmost <br />corner of the project site that would lead to the proposed parking lot, which would generally <br />occupy the portion of the site not covered by the proposed restaurant. The driveway <br />currently provides full access, and site access changes are not proposed as part of the <br />project. The proposed project would also include a new emergency vehicle turnout behind <br />the proposed building. Overall, the proposed project would provide sufficient emergency <br />vehicle access and circulation. Therefore, the proposed project would not substantially <br />increase hazards due to design features or incompatible uses, emergency access to the <br />site would be adequate, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />43 Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. <br />December 2018.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.