CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA PACKET

City of Pleasanton, CA (0012108.00) 4-3 Woodard & Curran, Inc. Pleasanton Long-Term Sewer CIP October 6, 2025 Scenario 2 – Projects Funded by Priority: Minimizes the City’s risk by proactively investing in rehabilitation and replacement of high-risk assets. This scenario offers the most flexible near-term spending to address the findings of gravity main, large diameter sewer main, siphon, and force main studies. However, the high up-front spending in the next 5 years may be difficult to achieve, given the City’s current capital spending of ~$3M. A chart of spending by year is shown in Figure 4-3. Capacity Projects: • All priority A capacity projects are completed in the near term. Lift Station Projects: • All priority A lift station projects are completed in the near-term, and all priority B projects are completed in the mid-term. Condition Assessment Projects: • Aims to eliminate the backlog of pipes with severe defects by FY30, based on findings from the recent Pleasanton Sewer Condition Assessment. However, if additional asset in poor-condition are identified (e.g., siphons, forcemains, large-diameter trunk sewers), this scenario provides the most flexibility to address them in the near term, with $6M available in FY27 –28 and $3M every year thereafter. The intent of this scenario is to minimize the City’s backlog of projects before the next rate study. Staffing: • This scenario requires 3 to 4 additional staff in the near to medium term (FY27 –35) to manage $5– 15M in capital work. FTE requirements decrease to 2 in the long term (FY35–44), managing an average of $6.5M annually. FIGURE 4-3: SCENARIO 2 – ANNUAL SPENDING BY FISCAL YEAR $0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 CI P C o s t ( $ M ) Priority A Priority B Priority C FTE Page 237 of 323