CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA PACKET

9 behalf of the City. This scope does not include PG&E coordination for undergrounding utilities. Any connection or application fees shall be paid for by the client. These fees are not included in this scope and fee. Fehr & Peers will collect pertinent data related to the design, including obtaining record drawings, performing field confirmation of as-built data, and obtaining geometry CAD files from Mark Thomas. Plans will be developed using the base files for existing conditions and proposed improvements from Mark Thomas. The traffic signal and street lighting PS&E will be submitted at the 65%, 95%, 100%, and Final design levels and will be reviewed by the City of Pleasanton. Comments will be addressed and incorporated into subsequent submittals. An engineers estimate and specifications will be provided at 65%, 95%, 100%, and Final design levels. This scope assumes we will receive one set of consolidated comments from the City at each review level. Task 5.6. Draft and Final Storm Water Management Plan Mark Thomas will prepare a Storm Water Control Plan in accordance with the City of Pleasanton Stormwater Permit requirements including a Storm Water Control Plan Checklist, Storm Water Requirements Checklist, Storm Water Management Plan (SMP), and Clean Bay Blueprint. The project is anticipated to require Provision C.3 Numerically Sized Treatment Requirements to size C.3 planters for reconstructed roadway pavement areas. C.3 planters are not required for bicycle and pedestrian facilities built within the existing paved roadway as they will direct stormwater runoff to adjacent vegetated areas. As such, preparation of sizing worksheets, special project worksheets, hydromodification calculations and flow duration controls are not included in this scope of services. A water pollution control plan showing the types and locations for BMPs during construction and permanent erosion control measures, including slope restorations measures, will be included in the final project plans. Task 5.7. Draft and Final SWPPP As a subconsultant to Mark Thomas, Crawford and Associates (Crawford)’s Qualified Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Developer (QSD) will prepare a design phase Conceptual SWPPP (CSWPPP) in compliance with the statewide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) CGP, Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ, most recently updated by Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. The CSWPPP will comply with City standards and any Project-specific requirements from the RWQCB. Mark Thomas will use the SWPPP template and guidance developed by the California Stormwater Quality Association. The CSWPPP will include the evaluation and documentation of the risk assessment as presented in the CGP. Mark Thomas will identify potential temporary water quality and erosion impacts of the Project and propose appropriate temporary construction site and erosion control BMP measures. These BMP measures will be identified on the Water Pollution Control (WPC) Plans included in the CSWPPP. Permit Registration Documents (PRD’s) will be prepared including the Notice of Intent (NOI), a risk assessment, post-construction calculations, a site map, a SWPPP, a signed certificate, and the first annual permit fee to be paid by the City. Mark Thomas will coordinate with the City for review and approval. The CSWPPP will be based on design-level information to be used for reference purposes only and will not be a construction document. Mark Thomas assumes no QSD or Qualified SWPPP Practitioner role during construction and that the selected Contractor’s QSD will be required to develop an independent SWPPP for approval by the City and uploaded to the State Water Resources Control Board’s Stormwater Multiple Applications and Report Tracking System (SMARTS). Task 5.8. Constructability Reviews Mark Thomas’ Construction Management Division engineers will conduct constructability review of the contract documents relative to issues that could impact the actual construction process, including standards, intersystem compatibility, subsurface information, existing facilities and utilities, interfaces with existing operations and other construction projects, access, egress, availability of proposed building materials, long lead procurement and labor sources. The goal of the constructability review is to improve the ease of construction, which in turn may reduce cost and/or time, as well as ensuring proper funding reimbursement. Constructability Review of the plans, specifications and engineer’s estimate will take place at the 65% and 95% Plan submittal. This work includes: • A field review of the Project limits. This field review will assist in comparing the planned improvements to the existing field conditions. • Review of the Project plans, special provisions, technical provisions and estimate for possible errors and deficiencies. Create a tracking spreadsheet to ensure any action items are properly sent to the appropriate party for review and any corrections made. Page 35 of 323