My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUPPLEMENTAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
110425 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUPPLEMENTAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2025 1:06:33 PM
Creation date
12/26/2025 1:06:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/4/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />From:Jack Balch <br />Sent:Friday, October 31, 2025 2:48 PM <br />To:Pleasanton City Clerk <br />Cc:Gerry Beaudin <br />Subject:FW: P25-0236 Tennis Court Lights, 2207 Martin Avene <br />FYI - for Record. <br /> <br /> <br />Jack Balch <br />Mayor <br />Cell: <br />jbalch@cityofpleasantonca.gov <br /> <br />Need Assistance? <br />Find City Services | Report a Concern | Contact City Departments <br />City Council Meetings - Public Comment Form <br /> <br />From: <br />Date: Thursday, October 30, 2025 at 1:05 PM <br />To: Jack Balch <jbalch@cityofpleasantonca.gov>, Jeff Nibert <jnibert@cityofpleasantonca.gov>, <br />geicher@cityofpleasantonca.gov <geicher@cityofpleasantonca.gov>, Matt Gaidos <br /><MGaidos@cityofpleasantonca.gov>, Julie Testa <jtesta@cityofpleasantonca.gov> <br />Cc: <br />Subject: P25-0236 Tennis Court Lights, 2207 Martin Avene <br />Mayor and Councilmembers, <br />Prior to the November 4th City Councill meeting, it is essential for each of you to <br />understand the background surrounding the current request for tennis-court lighting at <br />2207 Martin Avenue. <br /> <br />At the initial Planning Commission hearing on August 23, 2023, the homeowner made <br />multiple assurances—both to neighboring residents and to the Commission—that no <br />lighting would be installed. In exchange for those assurances, the Commission and <br />community were willing to support approval of chain-link fencing around the tennis <br />courts. <br />However, due to an oversight in the Commission’s final motion, the explicit prohibition <br />on lighting was inadvertently omitted from the formal conditions of approval. Following <br />that omission, the homeowner reversed his prior commitment and subsequently filed a <br />request to add lighting—contradicting the clear intent and understanding expressed <br />during the original hearing.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.