Laserfiche WebLink
Formal Objection to Application P25-0236 <br />Installation of Six 15-Foot, 1,000-Watt LED Light Poles at 2207 Martin Avenue <br /> <br />Date: October 31, 2025 <br />To: Mayor Jack Balch and Members of the Pleasanton City Council <br />From: Alan and Crista Shapiro, <br />Subject: Formal Objection to Application P25-0236 – Lighting Installation at 2207 Martin <br />Avenue <br />Dear Mayor Balch and City Councilmembers, <br />This letter serves as a formal and unequivocal objection to Application P25-0236, which <br />seeks approval to install six (6) 15-foot light poles equipped with high-intensity, 1,000-watt <br />LED fixtures along the side-yard boundary of a single-family residential property. <br />These poles are proposed within the required side-yard setback areas established by the <br />Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC), Title 18 – Zoning, and would introduce a commercial- <br />scale lighting installation into a low-density residential setting, contrary to the intent of City <br />zoning and design standards. <br />I was notified of this proposal via the City’s Planning Division Public Notice dated October <br />10, 2025. <br /> <br />Noncompliance with Setback Regulations <br /> <br />The proposed light poles would be located only 6.5 feet from the property line, encroaching <br />substantially into the required side-yard setback. Under PMC §18.84.090, only fences, walls, <br />landscaping, and minor structures of limited height may be located within required yards. <br />Fifteen-foot light poles are clearly not minor structures and are expressly prohibited within <br />the setback. <br /> <br />Key Points: <br />• Title 18 prohibits structures such as light poles within required yards unless they qualify <br />as minor landscape features. <br />• A 15-foot pole greatly exceeds allowable height and therefore constitutes an unlawful <br />encroachment. <br />• The proposed lighting equipment is industrial in scale, wholly inconsistent with the <br />character of surrounding single-family homes. <br />• Approval would erode the integrity of the zoning code and set a precedent for disregard of <br />established height and setback standards. <br />