My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
111825 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2025 1:59:45 PM
Creation date
12/26/2025 1:52:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/18/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 3 of 14 <br />maintain public access to a transfer site in the City, a long-term service agreement for a <br />transfer station should be developed that ensures access for the public as well as for <br />materials collected by the City’s franchisee. <br /> <br />It is essential to note that the transfer station services represent a relatively small <br />component of the overall solid waste management services, accounting for less than <br />5 percent of total contract costs. Staff believe it is important to evaluate decisions <br />regarding the transfer station or any future facility independently of the franchise collection <br />services agreement, yet in parallel, to ensure that each decision aligns with the City’s <br />overall contract objections. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br />Planning Process and Information Gathering <br />The franchise agreement with PGS expires on June 30, 2029. To prepare, staff, following <br />the direction of the Waste and Recycling subcommittee, developed a multi-pronged <br />process to gather information about options for the future of waste and recycling in <br />Pleasanton. The outcome of this process, along with analysis of ongoing regulatory <br />compliance issues at the current transfer station, informs the decision about whether to <br />negotiate with PGS in a sole-source environment or to issue a competitive RFP to solicit <br />proposals. <br />First, staff, working in collaboration with HF&H and Probolsky Research, developed a <br />comprehensive stakeholder engagement plan to gather community input and better <br />understand local needs and opinions related to waste and recycling services. This <br />included conducting a statistically valid survey of residential customers designed to <br />assess current <br />service satisfaction, identify community priorities regarding environmental sustainability ve <br />rsus cost considerations, evaluate transfer station usage and support, and gauge interest <br />in additional services not currently provided. Other engagement efforts included <br />residential community meetings, direct outreach to multi-family property owners and <br />building managers, discussions with leaders in the business community, and meetings <br />with potential service providers. <br /> <br />The City also engaged SCS Engineers, a leading national solid waste engineering firm, to <br />conduct a facility feasibility study analysis. This included a review of the following <br />considerations: <br />• Assessment of future public needs <br />• Assessment of current satisfaction with waste and recycling collection services <br />• Resolution of current regulatory issues <br />• Need for future facility franchisee use <br />• Assessment of improved current versus new transfer station site <br />• Requirements for development of new infrastructure (California Environmental <br />Quality Act (CEQA) studies; ownership and operation decisions; acquisition; <br />permitting; and development). <br /> <br />Compliance with Regulatory Requirements <br />PGS has historically provided reliable collection services for the City. However, <br />Page 75 of 399
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.