My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
111825 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2025 1:59:45 PM
Creation date
12/26/2025 1:52:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/18/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 of 14 <br />performance under the most recent franchise agreement has shown ongoing <br />inconsistencies. A key area of concern is compliance with state-mandated requirements, <br />particularly SB 1383, which establishes strict standards for organics diversion, recycling, <br />and recordkeeping. While PGS has corrected reporting gaps identified early in the <br />contract term, Pleasanton has not yet been reviewed by the state’s enforcement team. <br />That review is required to happen before 2027. State regulators will look to ensure full <br />compliance by all waste generators in the City and will rely on detailed records for <br />evidence of that compliance. In meetings with Pleasanton businesses, concerns were <br />raised by those businesses about their compliance with SB 1383 and other state laws <br />and their perception that they needed more support from PGS to meet those <br />requirements. <br /> <br />In 2022, the City conducted a comprehensive performance review and subsequent correc <br />tive action plan. The review focused on PGS’ compliance with three broad and <br />interrelated areas of the Franchise Agreement: <br />1. SB 1383 and other key regulatory compliance issues, including recordkeeping and <br />reporting; <br />2. Additional new and expanded programs and services; and <br />3. Customer service. <br /> <br />As a result of this review, staff worked with PGS to implement 20 corrective actions. These <br />included: <br />• Establishing adequate staffing levels and staff training; <br />• Developing an education and outreach plan; <br />• Creating protocols for route audits and establishing a regular audit schedule; and <br />• Improving data collection and reporting practices. <br /> <br />While progress has been made in several areas, PGS’s corrective actions for data collection <br />related to Tower, the software system it uses, remain. <br /> <br />In 2024, the City worked with SCS Engineers to develop a compliance plan and conduct <br />an annual site visit to audit the transfer station. Phase One of the project involved <br />creating a compliance plan and providing a method for the City to monitor and track <br />enforcement. <br /> <br />In Phase Two, City staff, in coordination with the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department <br />(LPFD), conducted an unannounced site visit of the transfer station. Following this visit, <br />SCS Engineers prepared a summary inspection report that included comments from all <br />participating agencies. The report identified multiple outstanding compliance issues <br />requiring immediate corrective action. Specifically, 21 corrective actions were outlined, <br />including: <br />• 12 LPFD violations related to fire safety, hazardous materials management, petrole <br />um storage, hazardous waste, and household hazardous waste. <br />• Environmental Services violations, including stormwater management deficiencies <br />Page 76 of 399
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.